Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Five and 2.9

2004-06-22 Thread Martijn Faassen
Janko Hauser wrote: Martijn Faassen wrote: There's the 'approach' and the implementation. The approach is fairly clear: a focus on baby steps to integrate into Zope 2.7. The aim is to introduce as much as possible as make sense of Zope 3 facilities into Zope 2. Besides ourself also Christian

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Five and 2.9

2004-06-21 Thread Jim Fulton
Janko Hauser wrote: ... Will this monkeypatch be somewhat of a blessed way to include view adapters into zope2? Yes, subject to my review. :) Perhaps the monkey patch can be integrated into 2.8. Than we can replace our current approach of using view adapters in union.cms with this one. Or will

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Five and 2.9

2004-06-16 Thread Martijn Faassen
Jim Fulton wrote: Raphael Ritz wrote: Thanks for this clairification, Jim. Alan, does that address your concerns? Any reasons left, not to adopt the five approach to Zope 3? Just understand that the Five approach is still being developed, so there's nothing to adopt yet. :) But I certainly

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Five and 2.9

2004-06-16 Thread Janko Hauser
Martijn Faassen wrote: There's the 'approach' and the implementation. The approach is fairly clear: a focus on baby steps to integrate into Zope 2.7. The aim is to introduce as much as possible as make sense of Zope 3 facilities into Zope 2. Besides ourself also Christian Heimes has done a

[Zope-dev] Re: Five and 2.9

2004-06-15 Thread Jim Fulton
Raphael Ritz wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: I heard that there was some discussion about the relationship between Martijn Faassen's Five project and future versions of Zope. I'd like to say, for the record, that I think Five is an important project. It is one of a number of projects to work out how to