Fred Drake wrote:
> On 12/22/05, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Jar files have no dependencies.
>
>
> Well, I know you know what you mean here, but I'll elaborate since the
> kids haven't started fighting yet this morning. :-)
>
> Jar files don't have dependency metadata. They're
Chris McDonough wrote:
> What do Java people expect from jar files (I ask as a Java dope)? Do
> they have a more limited scope (no dependencies, for example?)
Coming from a heavy java/j2ee background I can say that people in
java-land expect to place jar's on the java classpath (equivalent of
py
On 12/22/05, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jar files have no dependencies.
Well, I know you know what you mean here, but I'll elaborate since the
kids haven't started fighting yet this morning. :-)
Jar files don't have dependency metadata. They're pretty much
equivalent to zipped Py
--On 22. Dezember 2005 10:46:42 -0500 Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
What do Java people expect from jar files (I ask as a Java dope)? Do
they have a more limited scope (no dependencies, for example?)
Jar files have no dependencies.
-aj
pgpKlIVHcdQM0.pgp
Description: PGP sig
On Dec 22, 2005, at 10:17 AM, Rocky Burt wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
The question is this: do you think there should be an explicit
"install" step for egg packages/Products or do you think it should be
possible to just put eggs on your PYTHONPATH (and perhaps adjust a
config file with "requir
Chris McDonough wrote:
> The question is this: do you think there should be an explicit
> "install" step for egg packages/Products or do you think it should be
> possible to just put eggs on your PYTHONPATH (and perhaps adjust a
> config file with "requirements")?
To be honest, the explicit'nes
