Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
CMF or not - if one need such a functionality one can download CMF or
a related product. If such functionality should belong into the core
than it should be implemented in a reusable
OK, sorry about raising an issue that I was not around to comment on.
First, there seems to be a good deal of confusion on what FileSystemSite
or the DirectoryView portions of CMF are. They are simply a way to have
Zope2 programmatic content stored directly on the filesystem, including
dtml,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 2006-3-27 11:10 -0500:
...
CMF is a lot of overhead
Overhead of what kind?
to pull in just to get DirectoryView, and exactly
what to install to get DirectoryView and as little else as possible
installed
is not documented.
You install Products/CMFCore and register
Tres Seaver wrote:
I don't get what you mean: FilesystemSite *is* a separate packaging of
the DirectoryView /FS{DTMLMethod/PythonScript/PageTemplate/SQLMethod}
stuff, without any CMF dependencies.
Yes, exactly, there are several of them. Usually forked off from CMF's
DirectoryView at some
Andreas Jung wrote:
CMF or not - if one need such a functionality one can download CMF or
a related product. If such functionality should belong into the core
than it should be implemented in a reusable way and frameworks like CMF
should be build on top of it. So -1 for the request.
Indeed,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
CMF or not - if one need such a functionality one can download CMF or
a related product. If such functionality should belong into the core
than it should be implemented in a reusable way and frameworks
Chris Withers wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
CMF or not - if one need such a functionality one can download CMF or
a related product. If such functionality should belong into the core
than it should be implemented in a reusable way and frameworks like
CMF should be build on top of it. So -1 for
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Maybe its just me but I personally dont like direct filesystem
access in the core - if someone wants it, (s)he can pick from
the 3rd party products - maybe there can be a list of recommended
(active maintained) products? Direct access products should also
carry some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 24. März 2006 16:20:07 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't particularly care one way or the other about ZClasses.
However, I would like to see FileSystemSite made part of the
base distribution.
AFAIK
--On 25. März 2006 13:14:06 -0500 Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
FileSystemSite
This is a repackaging of the CMF's FileSystem Directory Views such
that it is independent of the CMF.
CMF or not - if one need such a functionality one can download CMF or
a related product. If such
10 matches
Mail list logo
