On 4/25/07, Christopher Lozinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And I would like these schema generators to understand not only specific python
objects, but also the network of python business objects.
[...]
I would like a security model based on business rules.
There is nothing in ZClasses that
But that isn't what he thinks he wants, :-)
Allow me to speak for what i want.
I am glad to hear that people think that there is a role for TTW editing. I am glad that there is a tool in Zope 3 for TTW editing. http://agendaless.com/Members/tseaver/software/userschema/ I am glad that th
--On 25. April 2007 07:48:04 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 4/24/07, Laurence Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I actually think TTW schema generation has some validity (so content
types can be easily generated by users).
Totally. What Christopher needs can be done with
On 4/24/07, Laurence Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I actually think TTW schema generation has some validity (so content
types can be easily generated by users).
Totally. What Christopher needs can be done with for example CPS,
quite easily, and maybe with Plone as well, if there is a TTW Sche
Laurence Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I actually think TTW schema generation has some validity (so content
> types can be easily generated by users). Restricted Python (in python
> scripts) just kind of sucks though for being almost python but a
> little different. You could keep python code
I actually think TTW schema generation has some validity (so content
types can be easily generated by users). Restricted Python (in python
scripts) just kind of sucks though for being almost python but a little
different. You could keep python code on the filesystem seperate and
just write adap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>> Martin Aspeli wrote:
>>> Plone development with Archetypes is not painful. Hundreds of developers
>>> do it, so it can't be that bad.
AT has the classic "Z-shaped curve" in spades: when it does what y
Andreas Jung-5 wrote:
>
>> Okay. Let me rephrase. Most people don't find it painful, and a huge
>> number of developers are being very productive with Archetypes. I know
>> you hate it Chris, but you are in the minority.
>>
>
> I have to second that. The latest versions of AT are pretty much s
--On 23. April 2007 03:57:25 -0700 Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Plone development with Archetypes is not painful. Hundreds of
developers do it, so it can't be that bad.
Urm, that's not true. Archetypes is the single most painful co
Chris Withers wrote:
>
> Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Plone development with Archetypes is not painful. Hundreds of developers
>> do it, so it can't be that bad.
>
> Urm, that's not true. Archetypes is the single most painful component to
> use from Plone...
>
> It's also the biggest source of
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Plone development with Archetypes is not painful. Hundreds of developers
do it, so it can't be that bad.
Urm, that's not true. Archetypes is the single most painful component to
use from Plone...
It's also the biggest source of frustration I have with Plone.
Chris
--
Christopher Lozinski wrote:
For those who have not been following this thread, here is the
proposal. http://wiki.zope.org/zope2/ZClassesNG
Can you please not start a new thread for every turn of this
conversation? 8 of the last 9 threads are by you on this exact issue.
Last night I realized
12 matches
Mail list logo
