[Zope-dev] Re: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: Using a truely revis ion based storage for Zope ?)

2004-04-16 Thread Casey Duncan
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 20:40:09 -0400 (EDT) Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Kapil Thangavelu wrote: > > > although i wonder if there is some hand waving in progress here that > > i can't see. i guess my semantic notion of versions has been that of > > long lived tran

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: Using a truely revis ion based storage for Zope ?)

2004-04-14 Thread Casey Duncan
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:50:17 -0400 Casey Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [..] > In practical terms this would mean that the versioned catalog would > need to keep track of the uids that had been cataloged, uncataloged > and reindexed in the version. The "merge" would mean cataloging, > uncatalogi

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: Using a truely revis ion based storage for Zope ?)

2004-04-14 Thread Casey Duncan
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 06:59:05 -0400 Kapil Thangavelu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 12:01, Shane Hathaway wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Kapil Thangavelu wrote: > > > > > since > > > objects modified in a version are in essence locked from > > > participating in other transact