[Zope-dev] Re: Zope Tests: 4 OK, 1 Failed

2007-12-29 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zope Tests Summarizer wrote: > Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. > Period Fri Dec 28 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Sat Dec 29 12:00:00 2007 UTC. > There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. > > > Test failures > - > > Subject: FAIL

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope Tests: 4 OK, 1 Failed

2008-03-25 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zope Tests Summarizer wrote: > Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. > Period Mon Mar 24 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Tue Mar 25 12:00:00 2008 UTC. > There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests. > > > Test failures > - > > Subject: FAILED (fa

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope Tests: 4 OK, 1 Failed

2008-03-25 Thread Benji York
Tres Seaver wrote: This looks somehow tied to the surgery you were doing yesterday on zope.testbrowser: can you check it out? Sure. After glancing at it, it looks like Google behaving differently than expected. Of course, it's a bad idea to make the tests depend on Google anyway. I'll

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope Tests: 4 OK, 1 Failed

2008-03-25 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benji York wrote: > Tres Seaver wrote: >> This looks somehow tied to the surgery you were doing yesterday on >> zope.testbrowser: can you check it out? > > Sure. > > > > After glancing at it, it looks like Google behaving differently than > expec

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Zope Tests: 4 OK, 1 Failed

2008-03-25 Thread Benji York
Benji York wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: This looks somehow tied to the surgery you were doing yesterday on zope.testbrowser: can you check it out? I'll take a look at it some more this evening and see if I can figure out what's up. The Zope 2 test failures don't look related to my recent work

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Zope Tests: 4 OK, 1 Failed

2008-03-26 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benji York wrote: > Benji York wrote: >> Tres Seaver wrote: >>> This looks somehow tied to the surgery you were doing yesterday on >>> zope.testbrowser: can you check it out? > >> I'll take a look at it some more this evening and see if I can figure