Sorry for the late replay to the list, I was having some problems with
my mail client which led to replies being rejected by various mailing
lists.
On Fri, 2001-10-12 at 02:38, Chris Withers wrote:
> Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
> >
> > dealing with RMS is tricky period.
>
> I am at a loss as to why
> If your question was actually "why does anyone bother with GPL license
> compatibility" then that is a separate discussion.
Indeed ;-)
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross po
At 10:38 AM 10/12/2001 +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
>Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
> >
> > dealing with RMS is tricky period.
>
>I am at a loss as to why anyone bothers ;-)
>
>(nope, this is not an attempt to start a flame war, everybody move along
>peacefully now...)
I am not going to proceed with a wa
Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
>
> dealing with RMS is tricky period.
I am at a loss as to why anyone bothers ;-)
(nope, this is not an attempt to start a flame war, everybody move along
peacefully now...)
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 11:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
Kapil Thangavelu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Only a little bit more arm twisting needs to be done
> > in order for RMS to approve ZPL 2.0 as GPL
> > compatable. We're very close, it's just sometimes,
> > "tricky" to get a straight answer when speaking
> Only a little bit more arm twisting needs to be done
> in order for RMS to approve ZPL 2.0 as GPL
> compatable. We're very close, it's just sometimes,
> "tricky" to get a straight answer when speaking in
> legal terms.
and there was much rejoicing:)
seriously, i'll buy a round for those invol
