"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
At 10:22 AM 8/27/00 +0100, Steve Alexander wrote:
I've fixed this by adding a test to the start of __set_attr__ of
DataSkins.py:
def __set_attr__(self,name,val,_v_dm_=_v_dm_):
+ if name=='id' and val==self.__dict__['id']:
+ return
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
try:
dm = self.__dict__[_v_dm_]
except KeyError:
if name=='id' and val==self.__dict__['id']: return
raise
Hopefully this should only perform the extra computations when the first
part fails...
Are Python classes derived from DataSkin
Steve Alexander wrote:
What rubbish! I didn't mean that at all!
I think what I meant was this:
try:
dm = self.__dict__[_v_dm_]
except KeyError:
if name=='id':
if self.__dict__.has_key('id') and val==self.__dict__.['id']:
return
else:
At 10:22 AM 8/27/00 +0100, Steve Alexander wrote:
I've fixed this by adding a test to the start of __set_attr__ of
DataSkins.py:
def __set_attr__(self,name,val,_v_dm_=_v_dm_):
+ if name=='id' and val==self.__dict__['id']:
+ return
dm = self.__dict__[_v_dm_]
This
