--On 24. Mai 2008 18:51:17 +0200 Brian Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 06:23:01PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 24. Mai 2008 17:57:17 +0200 Brian Sutherland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
- how d
Hi Jurgen. Thank you for keeping this thread going. It is helpful and
good to experiment with this further for light applications. I have not
given much attention to storage with orm since the early days of
sqlalchemy. There have been many improvements since then to the various
implementations.
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 2:24 PM, David Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jurgen. Thank you for this informative post. I am particularly
> interested in how this fits into the refactoring of legacy code. I
> appreciate your sharing your experiences. I also think everyone has been
> paying much
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 06:23:01PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
>
>
> --On 24. Mai 2008 17:57:17 +0200 Brian Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
>>> - how do you deal with hierarchical or semi-structured data
>>> (e.g. SGML, XML
--On 24. Mai 2008 17:57:17 +0200 Brian Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
- how do you deal with hierarchical or semi-structured data
(e.g. SGML, XML)?
As a side note, PostgreSQL 8.3 has a native XML column type. It's fairl
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
> - how do you deal with hierarchical or semi-structured data
> (e.g. SGML, XML)?
As a side note, PostgreSQL 8.3 has a native XML column type. It's fairly
basic still, but you can create indexes based on xpath queries.
I think future
Hi Jurgen. Thank you for this informative post. I am particularly
interested in how this fits into the refactoring of legacy code. I
appreciate your sharing your experiences. I also think everyone has been
paying much attention to the insight Lovely has been sharing on scaling
and efficient del
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --On 24. Mai 2008 10:47:54 +0200 Jürgen kartnaller <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There seems to be some interest on the use of SQL databases with Zope.
>>
>> Lovelysystems is now using SQL databases as the primary
--On 24. Mai 2008 10:47:54 +0200 Jürgen kartnaller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There seems to be some interest on the use of SQL databases with Zope.
Lovelysystems is now using SQL databases as the primary storage for their
applications. We use Zope and Postgres with Storm as ORM.
The main r
There seems to be some interest on the use of SQL databases with Zope.
Lovelysystems is now using SQL databases as the primary storage for their
applications. We use Zope and Postgres with Storm as ORM.
The main reason for switching to SQL database were speed issues with
queries.
Here is a short
10 matches
Mail list logo
