Bjorn Stabell wrote at 2003-9-11 09:59 +0800:
> ...
> I know, I was just trying to figure out how this was supposed to work.
> Currently setting Last-Modified seems to be the only way to get
> something cached in Apache; Expires alone is no good, and adding an Etag
> header doesn't seem to hav
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:59:22 +0800
"Bjorn Stabell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Setting Last-Modified to the current time isn't always the right
> thing; some objects, .e.g., Files, Images, Documents, have last
> modification times, and using those would be better. Not sure if
> the accelerato
I know, I was just trying to figure out how this was supposed to work.
Currently setting Last-Modified seems to be the only way to get
something cached in Apache; Expires alone is no good, and adding an
Etag
header doesn't seem to have any effect either. Maybe this should be
classified as an Apac
Carsten wrote:
> Well, sadly I didn't find the time to pursue the issue any
> further yet. We're kneedeep in work to get the system up and
> running and caching isn't top priority so far. I don't even
> know if someone patched the AHCM yet, simply haven't looked.
>
> But as someone suggested so
