Thanks Dieter,
I think ZPatterns is certainly worth a look. It allows you to
slice-and-dice what you want to store in ZODB or RDBMS. The best part is
you can develop totally in ZODB, then migrate to RDB a bit at a time (if
you like) without changing your app, or your data classes. We have
On Friday, 8. March 2002 09:50, Bjorn Stabell wrote:
I'm trying to use Zope without storing everything in ZODB while still
having the perception of an object-oriented database. I want to control
the object-to-relational mapping layer, but would like the loading and
saving of objects to be
Thomas Förster wrote:
On Friday, 8. March 2002 09:50, Bjorn Stabell wrote:
I'm trying to use Zope without storing everything in ZODB while still
having the perception of an object-oriented database. I want to control
the object-to-relational mapping layer, but would like the loading and
saving
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, March 08, 2002 17:27
Posted To: Zope Developer
Conversation: [Zope-dev] Manual object-to-relational persistency
framework
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Manual object-to-relational persistency
framework
On Friday, 8. March 2002 09:50, Bjorn Stabell wrote:
I'm
On Friday, 8. March 2002 13:06, Bjorn Stabell wrote:
I guess it would be possible to make a special Storage interface that
calls hooks in objects that have them to actually implement the
storage/persistency functionality, but that seems kind of overkill and
it'd mean I have to mount another
Bjorn Stabell writes:
I'm trying to use Zope without storing everything in ZODB while still
having the perception of an object-oriented database. I want to control
the object-to-relational mapping layer, but would like the loading and
saving of objects to be automatic. Is there some way