[cut]
> > Semantic Web are based on RDF:
> > One path might be (not only one):
> > RDF -> DAML+OIL -> OIL -> Description Logics further for example FaCT ->
ALC
> > and so on.
>
> Please don't use so many new acronyms. DAML and OIL are weird enough.
> FaCT? ALC? I have no idea what you just sugge
Hi Shane
Below is a posting from David McCusker who is working on the backedn of
Chandler.
===
From: Rys (David) McCusker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: repository access protocol Re: [Design] Knowing when you've
read
Tim
On 02/20/2003 09:06 PM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
In case your not aware Chandler OSAfoundation is basing their
new PIM on RDF/ZODB/Python etc...
if you haven't already it might be worth having a look at how they see
RDF fitting into the picture.
http://www.osafoundation.org/Chandler_rel._0.1.htm
Wow
Hi Shane
In case your not aware Chandler OSAfoundation is basing their
new PIM on RDF/ZODB/Python etc...
if you haven't already it might be worth having a look at how they see
RDF fitting into the picture.
http://www.osafoundation.org/Chandler_rel._0.1.htm
See ya
Tim
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 0
Lukasz Racon wrote:
I just read the RDF article published here:
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/02/12/rdflib.html
I've understood the mechanics of RDF for a while, but never understood
what makes it better than what we already have. Now I think I get it:
RDF theory is a new kind of database abstr
> I just read the RDF article published here:
>
> http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/02/12/rdflib.html
>
> I've understood the mechanics of RDF for a while, but never understood
> what makes it better than what we already have. Now I think I get it:
> RDF theory is a new kind of database abstraction.
