On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
> If your application can't be written in five minutes and you expect to use
> it more than once, you shouldn't use ZClasses - IMO. The only argument
> for ZClasses (that I had at the time) was that it was very easy and fast
> to set up a couple of classes a
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Morten W. Petersen wrote:
> How about meta-programming (designing) via the Zope interface, with
> UML or somesuch; automatically generating Python code, then enable
> designers to use a ZFormulator-ish product to edit the interface while
> a programmer can work on the 'backen
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Morten W. Petersen wrote:
>
> > How about meta-programming (designing) via the Zope interface, with
> > UML or somesuch; automatically generating Python code, then enable
> > designers to use a ZFormulator-ish product to edit the inter
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Andy McKay wrote:
> One thing Id been musing about for a while was a ZClass > Python Product
> script that took your ZClass and set up your basic python product for you.
> It would only work for simple for things like permissions, properties, basic
> methods... Then ZClasses
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Morten W. Petersen wrote:
> Well, it's quite logical: UML can be used to map out both software and
> business development (they are, after all, two sides of the same story),
> the designer can twiddle-n-polish the interface and the programmer can
> take care of 'exceptional t
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> - A simple DTML Zope programmers costs are okay and maybe below programmer
> average.
> - A good Zope/Python programmer will cost above average.
> - A good Zope/Python System-Designer is very expensive.
>
> Because of that you try to minimize the
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> 1. We are building a wizard that asks you all the necessary questions
> to generate a basic class framwework.
Sounds exactly like my mk-zprod.
> If anyone is interested in helping developing that tool (which will be
> released under the GPL as all o
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> I looked at the code pretty quick. I like it from the first view. It
> is very clean and easy to see the functionality. I think, if you can
> define an ZPI for your communication, then it will be no problem to
> put a SmartWizard Class Generator Front
