You didn't cc tres - but I'm sitting next to him, and informed him *we*
volunteered cabana if we want it.Tres actually doesn't use cabana as a
nameserver - mainly me (unless the other guys have changed how the have
their domains setup).
A
On 9/27/06 3:52 AM, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Sawyers wrote:
You didn't cc tres
Yeah, I know, but since Jens shouted at me shortly afterwards, I didn't
think I'd rectify the situation ;-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Will they slave a zone these days? ;)
On 9/27/06, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
If DNS is a bottleneck I volunteer to host the zope.org zone on my
colocated servers (ns1.dataflake.org as primary, ns1.zetwork.com as
secondary). The data center they are in (in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27 Sep 2006, at 17:01, Justizin wrote:
Will they slave a zone these days? ;)
On 9/27/06, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
If DNS is a bottleneck I volunteer to host the zope.org zone on my
colocated servers
Justizin wrote:
Perhaps I am making a wild and sweeping assumption here, but I think
that Chris is talking about the DNS servers which are controlled by
software the team I worked on at Rackspace was responsible for, and
look like ns.rackspace.com. ;)
Yep, so you're responsible for that crappy
On 9/27/06, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justizin wrote:
Perhaps I am making a wild and sweeping assumption here, but I think
that Chris is talking about the DNS servers which are controlled by
software the team I worked on at Rackspace was responsible for, and
look like
On 9/27/06 11:57 AM, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justizin wrote:
Perhaps I am making a wild and sweeping assumption here, but I think
that Chris is talking about the DNS servers which are controlled by
software the team I worked on at Rackspace was responsible for, and
look
On 9/27/06 12:10 PM, Justizin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/27/06, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justizin wrote:
When I left, I believe NS and NS2 were both load balanced clusters of
three large machines, which probably sit behind PrevenTier, a patented
DoS-aversion system,
I'm taking this offline with Chris.
I agree with the concerns about hosting in an individual personal
account, although we are doing no better at ZoneEdit right now with
JRyan36 or whatever the heck I am called.
On 9/27/06, Andrew Sawyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/27/06 11:57 AM, Chris
On 9/27/06, tweeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 10:37 am, Justizin wrote:
Tom - do you know if Rackspace's nameservers are capable of serving up
a slave copy of a zone which is managed at ZoneEdit.com?
We don't do that any longer on our main geo-load balanced ns
Thanks to both of you.
On 9/27/06, Andrew Sawyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You didn't cc tres - but I'm sitting next to him, and informed him *we*
volunteered cabana if we want it.Tres actually doesn't use cabana as a
nameserver - mainly me (unless the other guys have changed how the have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Sep 2006, at 17:39, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Andrew Sawyers wrote:
Yeah, definitely. And if we go with that tool I volunteer to be
hooked up as a secondary.
As do I .
All this DNS volunteering is great! Unfortunately, I'm a bit at a
On 9/26/06, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I believe a single DNS query over UDP can handle around 20-25 entries,
depending on their size.
Should be no problem for an 'NS' query for zope.org to point at ten or
more hosts which run
On 9/26/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Sawyers wrote:
Yeah, definitely. And if we go with that tool I volunteer to be
hooked up as a secondary.
As do I .
All this DNS volunteering is great! Unfortunately, I'm a bit at a loss
on how to proceed, as I'm not very
Justizin wrote:
So..
I was talking to Philipp the other day on IRC, wondering why
http://namespaces.zope.org/zope
Doesn't actually exist on on the intarweb. At first I wondered if it
was a requirement, like for a DTD, and P says no, so I believe him.
We did agree that it would be nice if
On 9/26/06 11:10 AM, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Sep 2006, at 17:02, Andrew Sawyers wrote:
We can use someone like zoneedit.com for the primary, and then have
a bunch
of secondaries.I'm sure there's lots of us who
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Sep 2006, at 17:48, Justizin wrote:
Well, since I don't know about the suggested provider, here's my
concern - let's say I manage your DNS on my servers, and you want to
provide your own local servers. How do you get a copy of the latest
On 9/26/06, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Sep 2006, at 17:48, Justizin wrote:
Well, since I don't know about the suggested provider, here's my
concern - let's say I manage your DNS on my servers, and you want to
provide your own
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Sep 2006, at 18:17, Lennart Regebro wrote:
I don't understand what you are debating, really. Could you clarify?
This is about propagating data from the primary DNS server (which
would be that service Andrew suggested) to the databases
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Sep 2006, at 18:20, Justizin wrote:
(a) ZoneEdit probably has more zones than Rackspace, which is
classified in Texas as a Small Business. ZoneEdit is well known
enough that a handful of people on this small mailing list know of it.
People
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Sep 2006, at 18:51, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 9/26/06, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not. I'm arguing against the higher number of secondaries that
you suggested earlier. Two secondaries is enough.
I'm guessing that's fine
Justizin wrote:
On 9/26/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I'm glad to be the lead, and I'm glad for either of the other guys to
be the lead. ;d
You're the only one volunteering for this right now, as far as I can
see, so if you think you and Jens can get along after this
So..
I was talking to Philipp the other day on IRC, wondering why
http://namespaces.zope.org/zope
Doesn't actually exist on on the intarweb. At first I wondered if it
was a requirement, like for a DTD, and P says no, so I believe him.
We did agree that it would be nice if something lived
23 matches
Mail list logo
