Five 1.0.1 released!
The Five team is happy to release Five 1.0.1, a bugfix release for
Five 1.0. The most important news is unicode support for add and edit
forms; other minor fixes are included as well. Please consult the
CHANGES_ for more details.
.. _CHANGES: http://co
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Stephan Richter wrote:
>
>> Here is how to do it for the current trunk.
>>
>> 1. Create your custom HTTPPublicationRequestFactory implementation,
>> basically extending the __call__() method.
>>
>> 2. Create a server type using your own factory; see
>> zope.app.s
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:37:32AM -0600, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> | I have only GUI code so far, because in this project, I want the UI to
> | drive the requirements. I'm thinking about the code behind it now.
>
> Ok. What are you using for drawing the UI? I just googled
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 26 May 2005 12:53, Jim Washington wrote:
I would rather not alter and maintain the foundation-level code in
zope.app.pub*. Would it be possible to do this as a product? Presuming
it is bad form to monkey-patch zope.app.publication.httpfactory, is
there a mor
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:37:32AM -0600, Shane Hathaway wrote:
| I have only GUI code so far, because in this project, I want the UI to
| drive the requirements. I'm thinking about the code behind it now.
Ok. What are you using for drawing the UI? I just googled for wxGlade
but it seems like it
Florent Guillaume wrote:
> Ivo van der Wijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>- Errors withing PageTemplates (and/or associated views) aren't
>>displayed very intuitively either. The PageTemplate causing the error
>>is usually not mentioned either. If I recall correctly, someone
>>already had a patc
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:05:42AM -0600, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> | > I had started a similar editor using a Web UI. It was very functional and
> did
> | > all the hard parts already. I only had some wizard-like functionality
> left to
> | > do. I could send you the cod
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:05:42AM -0600, Shane Hathaway wrote:
| > I had started a similar editor using a Web UI. It was very functional and
did
| > all the hard parts already. I only had some wizard-like functionality left
to
| > do. I could send you the code, if you want.
|
| Thanks, but I
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Sunday 29 May 2005 03:45, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>
>>With that in mind, I started working this week on a wxPython-based Zope
>>3 configuration editor. Right now there's just a skeleton of a UI, but
>>the UI is already designed to ease most of the things I find difficult
Ivo van der Wijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Errors withing PageTemplates (and/or associated views) aren't
> displayed very intuitively either. The PageTemplate causing the error
> is usually not mentioned either. If I recall correctly, someone
> already had a patch to give more sensible stackt
Stephan --
We're using ZCML for a non-Zope application, and a web-based
configuration utility would be useful. I'd be happy to look through
your code and take up maintenance of it. I think it'd be beneficial
for Zope 3 users, as well as our users. So please, send your code :).
Thanks,
Nathan
On Sunday 29 May 2005 04:52, Ivo van der Wijk wrote:
> Sounds and looks interesting. I've been considering to write (at
> least) some sort of zcml browsing tool, but it was less trivial due to
> the ease of defining your own zcml directives (and the unknown
> semantics of these "third party" direct
On Sunday 29 May 2005 03:45, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> With that in mind, I started working this week on a wxPython-based Zope
> 3 configuration editor. Right now there's just a skeleton of a UI, but
> the UI is already designed to ease most of the things I find difficult
> when writing for Zope 3.
Florent Guillaume wrote:
> On 31 May 2005, at 12:39, Garrett Smith wrote:
>>> That looks good to me. Especially because, using interfaces, we
>>> could theoretically express more than just a set of attributes that
>>> have changed on an object. I'm thinking of:
>>>
>>> - having the interface itsel
On 31 May 2005, at 12:39, Garrett Smith wrote:
That looks good to me. Especially because, using interfaces, we could
theoretically express more than just a set of attributes that have
changed on an object. I'm thinking of:
- having the interface itself add semantics to what a subscriber
could
Florent Guillaume wrote:
> Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Based on the discussion so far, I'm convinced that something like
>> this would be useful, at least as an optional feature, as you
>> suggest.
>>
>> I suggest we generalize this a bit. I suggest that the
>> ObjectModified event
Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on the discussion so far, I'm convinced that something like this
> would be useful, at least as an optional feature, as you suggest.
>
> I suggest we generalize this a bit. I suggest that the ObjectModified
> event could accept one or more modificati
E. Frerich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > line 545 of zope\app\container\contained.py contains a testcase ">>>
> > > setitem(container, container.__setitem__, 'hello ' + chr(200),
> > > item)" which should give back a traceback: "Traceback (most
> > > recent call last):
> > > ...
> > >
Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
Zope 2 has the nice ability to allow you to override Products.
For example, I just found a bug in ZCTextIndex which will need fixing,
so between now and 2.7.7, I can just run with a patched ZCTextIndex
product in my instance home without having to worry about wheth
19 matches
Mail list logo
