Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/jinty/releases/release-assistent.py, line 260, in ?
main(sys.argv)
File /home/jinty/releases/release-assistent.py, line 257, in main
builder.run()
File /home/jinty/releases/release-assistent.py, line 169, in run
self.buildReleases()
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 07:13:16AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
Brian Sutherland wrote:
Since we are close to the release, I felt compelled to ask before I did
this. Could I revert 39890 [1] for the 3.2 release?
No.
Ok, good thing I asked first then;) I'll work around it or wait.
Why wait
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 05:52, Encolpe Degoute wrote:
Simon Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] implemented exclude path:
http://zopewiki.org/I18nextract
Could you make that patch against the trunk please? Or actually, Michael has
to check it in himself, due to IP regulations.
Regards,
Stephan
--
On Saturday 26 November 2005 17:04, Roger Ineichen wrote:
We lost the user name information at the beginning of november.
Any idea if we could get this information back?
Yeah, I was hoping to get this done and coordinated before the release, but I
did not. What we really need here is a WSGI
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 10:33, Jim Fulton wrote:
Did we also lose the information when using zope.server? I fear so.
Yep.
Has this been brought up on the Web SIG mailing list?
We originally wanted to wait and try a sample implementation between Twisted
and Zope 3 first. I think this was a
On Thursday 01 December 2005 10:31, Marius Gedminas wrote:
When you do HTTP DELETE on objects that do not explicitly support
deletion, the default view (zope.app.http.delete.DELETE) tries to adapt
self.context.__parent__ to IWriteDirectory, which raises a TypeError
which is never caught. I
On Thursday 08 December 2005 10:11, Gary Poster wrote:
Thoughts?
+1
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
This is fairly serious, but I don't want it to delay 3.2.1 final.
I suggest we try to fix this the week after the final release.
I'd like to shoot for getting a 3.2.1 release out around the end of January.
I'd like to see a beta release around the middle of the month.
Jim
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday 26 December 2005 23:38, ve le wrote:
I had config ssh on subversion, but it not run
Can you guide to me config?
You need to provide us with more details on what's going wrong in your setup.
What is the error message you got? Have you signed a contributor agreement?
Have you
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches Zope-3.1 2.4 Windows
2000 zc-bbwin4.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: The web-page 'force build' button was pressed by '':
Build Source Stamp: None
Blamelist:
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
On Friday 16 December 2005 15:59, Gary Poster wrote:
To do so, my hack makes you do two things: remove the first line of
the doc test (where you import the Browser), and change your
ftests.py to run the same doc test twice, once with virtual hosting,
and once without.
I have to do your
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 14:02, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Would anyone be against those changes?
I would be okay with this abstraction, since you have provided a useful use
case.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web
This should have been really posted on zope3-users.
On Monday 28 November 2005 00:53, Jeff Rush wrote:
What are the two folders here, named 'default' and 'tools'? And why does
the 'Visit default folder' link take me to the same place as clicking on
the 'default' folder itself? One of the
On Thursday 01 December 2005 09:28, Chris Withers wrote:
Do we want Zope to always respond to this header?
Yes, it's helpful for testing, but surely it risks information
disclosure vulnerabilities or worse if used on a production application?
The user would receive no useful information, since
--On 29. Dezember 2005 10:08:03 -0330 Rocky Burt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Another argument against removing python expressions: in Zope 2
scripters could directly modify and test templates, script etc. (also
using the skins tool). In Z3 you have to restart the server
Andreas Jung wrote:
To bring it to the point: _scripters_ should be able to develop in Zope
3 as easy as in Zope 2 :-)
-aj
I'd go further and say regular developers should be able to develop
faster with Zope 3 by having automatic reloading in most python modules
in debug mode :-)
-
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:51:04AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
Brian Sutherland wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 07:13:16AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
Because I only realized it was causing a headache for me yesterday.
I greatly appreciate your working on Debian packaging. I encourage
you to
On Friday 16 December 2005 16:20, Benji York wrote:
Stephan zope/viewlet/README.txt:147
Okay, I converted this one to a TODO, which it really is.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 05:06, Adam Groszer wrote:
Is that by intention?
No. Though we would need it for the set as well. Feel free to check this ion,
preferably with a test.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web
Hi all,
now that we switched to time-based releases, it seems that our policy to
support old API for two more 3.x releases is not appropriate anymore. Two
release cycles are now only 12 months long, which seems a bit short. So let's
make the deprecation support also time-based. What time would
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches 3.2 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 2550
Blamelist: benji_york,jinty,oestermeier,srichter
BUILD FAILED: failed failed slave lost
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 29. Dezember 2005 10:08:03 -0330 Rocky Burt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Another argument against removing python expressions: in Zope 2
scripters could directly modify and test templates, script etc. (also
using the skins tool). In Z3 you
Stephan Richter wrote:
So let's make the deprecation support also time-based. What time would
you prefer?
I would prefer two releases and a minimum of 12 months. That way if
the time-based releases slip, we still guarantee two releases with
backward compatible code. If we release more often,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches 3.2 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin.
This was apparently caused by a failed checkout. A new attempt has been
initiated.
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 04:06, Tadashi Matsumoto wrote:
I have made a test. It works well (perhaps).
This test program is small, so I have attached in this mail.
Thank you very much. See revision 41109.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 13:33, Benji York wrote:
As a corollary, it would be time now to remove the BBB that should be
removed for 3.3. Should we wait for 3.4?
Following the rules above, if 3.3 will be released more than 12 months
since the release of 3.1, it would
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin3.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 2558
Blamelist: jim,srichter
BUILD FAILED: failed failed slave lost
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
Benji York wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 13:33, Benji York wrote:
As a corollary, it would be time now to remove the BBB that should be
removed for 3.3. Should we wait for 3.4?
Following the rules above, if 3.3 will be released more than 12 months
since the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan Richter a ?crit :
| On Tuesday 03 January 2006 05:52, Encolpe Degoute wrote:
|
|Simon Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] implemented exclude path:
|http://zopewiki.org/I18nextract
|
|
| Could you make that patch against the trunk please? Or actually,
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 2568
Blamelist: srichter
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
___
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Linux tlotze.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 2568
Blamelist: srichter
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
___
Zope3-dev
31 matches
Mail list logo
