On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:47:28AM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
> I'm very much against "relaxed" date/time format checking. I tend to
> give my user the exact format that is expected and fail otherwise. All
> the guessing in the past led to bad bad errors because the field order
> the user en
Hi,
I'll plan to rollback the revision 68818 on the 3.3 branch (hmm, should I also
rollback the revision 68821?) and add Date(time)I18NWidget instead before the
weekend. It seems so big change for the 3.3 branch and need more discussion
(also the change broke SchoolTool functional tests).
--
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 05:47, Christian Theune wrote:
I'm very much against "relaxed" date/time format checking. I tend to
give my user the exact format that is expected and fail otherwise. All
the guessing in the past led to bad bad errors because the fie
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Christian Theune wrote:
I'm very much against "relaxed" date/time format checking. I tend to
give my user the exact format that is expected and fail otherwise. All
the guessing in the past led to bad bad errors because the field order
the user entered was syn
Previously Christian Theune wrote:
> I'm very much against "relaxed" date/time format checking. I tend to
> give my user the exact format that is expected and fail otherwise. All
> the guessing in the past led to bad bad errors because the field order
> the user entered was syntactically compati
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 05:47, Christian Theune wrote:
> I'm very much against "relaxed" date/time format checking. I tend to
> give my user the exact format that is expected and fail otherwise. All
> the guessing in the past led to bad bad errors because the field order
> the user entered was sy
Dmitry Vasiliev wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
However, I'm not sure the new widget behavior is great for non-default
locales either. Certainly being able to display dates in a
locale-specific way is nice, but the input seems to be problematic.
If you specify an ACCEPT-LANGUAGE of "en-US", for i
