Hi,
I'd like to propose spending some time together bashing some bugs before
doing the release candidate for Zope 3.4.
My calendar is pretty stuffed, but I'd be happy to spend the larger part
of an afternoon next week.
Christian
___
Zope3-dev mailing
Hello Fred,
I'll say silence is consent.
I'll need some time to merge. Might be I should write a test before.
Wednesday, August 8, 2007, 5:48:11 AM, you wrote:
> On 7/21/07, Adam Groszer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Seems like it's ready. Apidoc had to be modified too.
>> The egg seems to be bu
Hello,
Seems like it's not so easy to get a complete history log of the
satellites. (e.g. zope\app\authentication\principalfolder.py).
Where shall I look for it?
--
Best regards,
Adam mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope3-dev m
Adam Groszer wrote:
Hello,
Seems like it's not so easy to get a complete history log of the
satellites. (e.g. zope\app\authentication\principalfolder.py).
Where shall I look for it?
If you don't use "--stop-on-copy" switch of svn log, you will get
complete log.
Regards,
Baiju M
___
Adam Groszer wrote:
Hello Fred,
I'll say silence is consent.
I'll need some time to merge. Might be I should write a test before.
I'll try to take a look at the branch in the next couple of days and
give you some feedback.
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
_
Roman Joost wrote:
we're doing some dependency checking at gocept and I discovered that
zope.annotation depends on zope.app.container in its factory.
What shall we do with this dependency to zope.app.container? Moving this
factory to zope.app is probably not the best solution.
To be clear, zop
Michael Howitz wrote:
zope.app.component.interfaces.ISite is used in (at least) zope.location,
so the site concept seems to be necessary outside zope.app.
It seem so. Please also see my reply to Roman's email.
I think, ISite should be migrated to zope.component or even (if it has
nothing to d
On Thursday 09 August 2007 14:59, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> When we moved stuff out of zope.app, we made the mistake of overloading
> zope.component. I wouldn't want to make that mistake again. That's why I
> don't think it should go into zope.component. I was once close to moving
> ISite
On 8/9/07, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree, the site concept is about locality, which is a concept on top of
> zope.component.
Perhaps a reasonable description; I'd describe it more as a tool for
internal organization of an application.
> I think "site" is widely understood t
