Thanks for the quick response everybody. Next time I'll be sure to
include the full traceback.
- Paul
On 8/15/07, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just released a b5 egg which should correct the problem.
>
> Jim
>
> On Aug 15, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> > Previousl
Hey,
Given the momentary confusion surrounding the release of a broken
package. By broken package in this case I mean something which seriously
breaks many many Zope 3 installations in an obvious way.
I think it might be wise to start working out some procedure surrounding
such a situation.
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 12:02 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
> On Aug 15, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
> > I'm not sure that we should have to rely on removing packages like
> > those.
>
> I'm fairly sure that removing them is *not* the right solution. For
> example, that might ha
On Aug 15, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
[snip]
Just ran into this one. I think removing it is the right
decision. b2 did work for me, but b4 just broke on me.
Try b5.
I'd love to try the mysterious b5, but it's just not there. :)
I tried to put it there, bu
On Aug 15, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 17:52 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Christian Theune wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
Hi,
I saw the error
Jim Fulton wrote:
[snip]
Just ran into this one. I think removing it is the right decision. b2
did work for me, but b4 just broke on me.
Try b5.
I'd love to try the mysterious b5, but it's just not there. :)
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope3-dev mailing
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 17:59 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
> Where is this b5? I am still getting b4, not b5. I can't find b5 on the
> server.
I've put it there now. The actual distribution was missing. I've created
the b5 tag and uploaded the sdist package.
_
On Aug 15, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
I'm not sure that we should have to rely on removing packages like
those.
I'm fairly sure that removing them is *not* the right solution. For
example, that might have broken other applications. (After all, I
released b4 for a reason.)
Christian Theune wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 17:52 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Christian Theune wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
Hi,
I saw the error reports about zope.security and got talked to from a few
On Aug 15, 2007, at 11:52 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Christian Theune wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
Hi,
I saw the error reports about zope.security and got talked to
from a few
people that they had severe probl
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 17:52 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Previously Christian Theune wrote:
> >> Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I saw the error reports about zope.security and got talked to from a few
>
Christian Theune wrote:
Hey,
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
Hi,
I saw the error reports about zope.security and got talked to from a few
people that they had severe problems managing around this. I removed the
3.4b4 distribution from download.zope.org to all
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Christian Theune wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
Hi,
I saw the error reports about zope.security and got talked to from a few
people that they had severe problems managing around this. I removed the
3.4b4 distribution
I've just released a b5 egg which should correct the problem.
Jim
On Aug 15, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Jim Fulton wrote:
On Aug 14, 2007, at 7:32 PM, Paul Carduner wrote:
Hello zope3-dev,
I came across an error I have not seen before. Just for reference,
here i
On Aug 15, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
...
We badly need to get a handle on how we expect people to fetch eggs
for
packages: having such a refactoring affect an indirect client (one
not
expecting to track day-to-day development) is a disaster.
I'm not sure disaster is the word I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 August 2007 08:01, Christian Theune wrote:
>> zope.traversing has a dependency to zope.app.applicationcontroller. This
>> is because zope.traversing implements the "etc" namespace and has a hard
>> coded referen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Aug 14, 2007, at 7:32 PM, Paul Carduner wrote:
>
>> Hello zope3-dev,
>>
>> I came across an error I have not seen before. Just for reference,
>> here is the last snippet from the traceback:
>>
>> File "/home/pcardune/Work/ZCont
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Howitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after thinking the problem over at gocept we came to the following
> suggestion:
>
> - A site is a place which gives acces to a component registry.
> - ISite isn't a good name for the concept behind it, because it is
Previously Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> On Aug 14, 2007, at 7:32 PM, Paul Carduner wrote:
>
> >Hello zope3-dev,
> >
> >I came across an error I have not seen before. Just for reference,
> >here is the last snippet from the traceback:
> >
> >File "/home/pcardune/Work/ZContact/zcontact-lp/eggs/tmpgwuq6O/
On Aug 14, 2007, at 7:32 PM, Paul Carduner wrote:
Hello zope3-dev,
I came across an error I have not seen before. Just for reference,
here is the last snippet from the traceback:
File "/home/pcardune/Work/ZContact/zcontact-lp/eggs/tmpgwuq6O/
zope.security-3.4.0b4-py2.4-linux-i686.egg/zope/s
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 07:43, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
> For the annotation factory using zope.location and ILocatable would be
> sufficient. So we could get rid of the zope.app.container dependency.
+1
> We should be a bit more specific about the IContained interface. Does
> it make any
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 07:41, Michael Howitz wrote:
> - ISite isn't a good name for the concept behind it, because it is
> connected too tight to a website and on having hierarchical
> structures (at least in the code).
I think this is a matter of documentation and explanation. Anyone wor
Hey,
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
> Hi,
>
> I saw the error reports about zope.security and got talked to from a few
> people that they had severe problems managing around this. I removed the
> 3.4b4 distribution from download.zope.org to allow them to contin
Previously Christian Theune wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I saw the error reports about zope.security and got talked to from a few
> > people that they had severe problems managing around this. I removed the
> > 3.4b4 distribution from
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
> Hi,
>
> I saw the error reports about zope.security and got talked to from a few
> people that they had severe problems managing around this. I removed the
> 3.4b4 distribution from download.zope.org to allow them to continue
> u
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 08:01, Christian Theune wrote:
> zope.traversing has a dependency to zope.app.applicationcontroller. This
> is because zope.traversing implements the "etc" namespace and has a hard
> coded reference to "applicationcontrol" there.
>
> In the same place it also looks up si
Hi,
I saw the error reports about zope.security and got talked to from a few
people that they had severe problems managing around this. I removed the
3.4b4 distribution from download.zope.org to allow them to continue
using zopeproject and grokproject until we find a fix.
I wasn't sure about that
Hi,
zope.traversing has a dependency to zope.app.applicationcontroller. This
is because zope.traversing implements the "etc" namespace and has a hard
coded reference to "applicationcontrol" there.
In the same place it also looks up site managers (in a hard coded way).
As a strategy to remove th
On 2007-08-09 20:51:26 +0200, Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Roman Joost wrote:
we're doing some dependency checking at gocept and I discovered that
zope.annotation depends on zope.app.container in its factory.
What shall we do with this dependency to zope.app.container?
Hi,
after thinking the problem over at gocept we came to the following
suggestion:
- A site is a place which gives acces to a component registry.
- ISite isn't a good name for the concept behind it, because it is
connected too tight to a website and on having hierarchical
structures (at l
Previously Paul Carduner wrote:
> Hello zope3-dev,
>
> I came across an error I have not seen before. Just for reference,
> here is the last snippet from the traceback:
>
> File
> "/home/pcardune/Work/ZContact/zcontact-lp/eggs/tmpgwuq6O/zope.security-3.4.0b4-py2.4-linux-i686.egg/zope/security/c
31 matches
Mail list logo
