Stefane Fermigier wrote:
> Nuxeo, with the kind help of the Zope team of Chalmers
> University, plans to organise a Zope 3 sprint on April 3-7 in our
> premises in Paris.
>
I'm afraid we'll have to change the dates, to accomodate for several
schedule contraints (inclu
Benji York wrote:
> Geoff Davis wrote:
>> * What can we learn from Rails / Django / TurboGears?
>
> Fun presentation along those lines:
> http://oodt.jpl.nasa.gov/better-web-app.mov
>
> One of the best put together movies I've seen.
Yeah, really awesome! Should have won the Oscar! ;)
Another
Nuxeo, with the kind help of the Zope team of Chalmers
University, plans to organise a Zope 3 sprint on April 3-7 in our
premises in Paris.
The focus of the sprint, like last year's successful sprint, will be ECM
(Enterprise Content Management).
Last year's Paris sprint was a turning point for th
Strange how (most of) the Plone people seem to be so quick in willing to
sacrifice the Zope brand :(
S.
--
Stéfane Fermigier, Tel: +33 (0)6 63 04 12 77 (mobile).
Nuxeo Collaborative Portal Server: http://www.nuxeo.com/cps
Gestion de contenu web / portail collaboratif / groupware / open source!
Geoff Davis wrote:
> Yes, and the use of the new name "Z" or "Zed" is a way to emphasize that
> the Zed library is NOT a big, monolithic app server; rather, it's
> something new and cool.
>
Zope 3 is new and cool.
Or at least, let's spin it this way.
Screencasts, podcasts, 14'59" wikis (quick
Jeff Shell wrote:
> - Zope 3 CA: The Zope Component Architecture. Core services. Would
> include zope.publisher and most other current top level zope.* things.
> Usable as a library, as a publisher for other environments, perhaps as a
> simple standalone server. Easy to deploy against WSGI, P
Geoff Davis wrote:
> I think that the idea of giving Zed its own, distinct identity is great.
I think it is stupid.
We (Zope Corp + the Zope Community) have spent 8 years building the Zope
brand, and you want to restart from scratch ?
S.
--
Stéfane Fermigier, Tel: +33 (0)6 63 04 12 77 (mobil
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 February 2006 07:39, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>
>> I know I sound conservative here, but I'm actually happy with the way
>> things are working now. Let's not fix what isn't broken. We can make
>> incremental steps to making it better, and I'm glad people are
Max M wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>
>> 2) In an alternate vision, Zope 2 evolves to Zope 5.
>
> Zope 2 is complicated! It has too many layers of everything.
Layers are good, when they reliably hide complexity.
> The reason for Zope 3 is to make it simpler for developers.
Yep. 14'30'' wikis and su
Stephan Richter wrote:
>(2) I fear that the ZSCP would be talked to death and stay dead. My experience
>in the Open Source world has shown that if something does not have
>practicality, it dies unless someone is getting paid. I am certainly not
>getting paid for this. By biggest interest here i
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>Andrew Milton wrote:
>
>
>>+---[ Stephan Richter ]--
>>| Hello everyone,
>>|
>>| With the development of Zope 3, the Zope developers committed to a new
>>| development process and higher software quality guidelines. With the
>>adoption
I have made a little update on the Zope article on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zope
Here is the diff:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zope&diff=36787848&oldid=36094466
It would probably be very helpful if some knowledgeable people would
also take some time to review the wh
Hi guys,
it's funny that you were setting up a builbot at the same time as me for
CPS (which is Zope2-based):
http://buildbot.nuxeo.org/
I'm sorry that I can't provide slaves for Zope3, because we already have
a shortage of slaves for CPS.
Also: I'm only testing on Linux (Debian and Mandri
Original Message
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Call for Papers -- OSS Database Conference
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 11:55:54 -0700
From: Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: PostgreSQL Project
To: pgsql-announce@postgresql.org
Software & Support Verlag,
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 08:43, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Maik Röder wrote:
Before endorsing the project I just need to be sure that there is
a healthy community.
catch-22 :-) to have a healthy community you need a project that is not
just vapourware an
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
The project is already in the hands of a community - we have already
commitments from Nuxeo, Infrae, Chalmers University.
Sorry, I forgot to mention that the project owes a lot to the work of
Paul Everitt, working on behalf of both the Zope Europe Association and
the
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
The project is already in the hands of a community - we have already
commitments from Nuxeo, Infrae, Chalmers University.
Sorry, I forgot to mention that the project owes a lot to the work of
Paul Everitt, working on behalf of both the Zope Europe Association and
the
(Resent to zope3-dev because I was not subscribed).
Maik Röder wrote:
Hi,
Here we are supposed to have the notion of cooperation diluted in some
sort of undefined abstract notion of cooperation between anonymous
participants that have to leave their badge at the entrance.
When I say neutral, I mea
18 matches
Mail list logo
