[Zope3-dev] Re: Duplicated zope.decorator in zope.app.container

2006-09-25 Thread Wolfgang Schnerring
[moving to the list because it might be of wider interest] * Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-22 07:27]: > On Sep 22, 2006, at 4:23 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote: > >Hi Jim, > > > >Theuni and I refactored zope.decorator and put its contents into >

[Zope3-dev] Re: Specification/Security-Decorator usage

2006-09-22 Thread Wolfgang Schnerring
* Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-22 10:49]: > Wolfgang Schnerring wrote: > >>>However, when I tried to refactor zope.location.location.LocationProxy > >>>to use said base classes, it broke the functional tests for > >>>zope.app

[Zope3-dev] Re: Specification/Security-Decorator usage

2006-09-22 Thread Wolfgang Schnerring
* Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-22 10:01]: > >However, when I tried to refactor zope.location.location.LocationProxy > >to use said base classes, it broke the functional tests for > >zope.app.apidoc.introspector -- for reasons I totally don't > >understand. > > A traceback

[Zope3-dev] Specification/Security-Decorator usage

2006-09-22 Thread Wolfgang Schnerring
Hi, I just refactored zope.decorator into zope.proxy.decorator and zope.security.decorator as discussed in http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.zope3/18581. Contrary to that discussion, Theuni and I thought that the *DecoratorBase classes are actually useful because they provide an abstrac