[moving to the list because it might be of wider interest]
* Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-22 07:27]:
> On Sep 22, 2006, at 4:23 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
> >Hi Jim,
> >
> >Theuni and I refactored zope.decorator and put its contents into
>
* Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-22 10:49]:
> Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
> >>>However, when I tried to refactor zope.location.location.LocationProxy
> >>>to use said base classes, it broke the functional tests for
> >>>zope.app
* Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-22 10:01]:
> >However, when I tried to refactor zope.location.location.LocationProxy
> >to use said base classes, it broke the functional tests for
> >zope.app.apidoc.introspector -- for reasons I totally don't
> >understand.
>
> A traceback
Hi,
I just refactored zope.decorator into zope.proxy.decorator and
zope.security.decorator as discussed in
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.zope3/18581.
Contrary to that discussion, Theuni and I thought that the
*DecoratorBase classes are actually useful because they provide an
abstrac