On 19 Jul 2007, at 19:36 , Dieter Maurer wrote:
...
Things are a bit different with external dependencies (docutils,
mechanize, ClientForm, twisted, etc.), I think. They bear a higher
risk
of breaking stuff for us in future releases, even if they're just
minor
releases, because we don't cont
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2007-7-18 23:24 +0200:
>Up until now we've been a bit sloppy when it came to egg dependencies.
>Not specifying a version number or range basically means that the code
>in question assumes it will work with any future version of its
>dependency.
Which often is
On Jul 18, 2007, at 5:24 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Up until now we've been a bit sloppy when it came to egg
dependencies. Not specifying a version number or range basically
means that the code in question assumes it will work with any
future version of its dependency. Admittedly
Up until now we've been a bit sloppy when it came to egg dependencies.
Not specifying a version number or range basically means that the code
in question assumes it will work with any future version of its
dependency. Admittedly, setuptools doesn't exactly make it easy to say
"I depend on ZODB
