Darn. I'm sorry. I didn't want to bounce the private mail to the list,
but happened to already had it in the CC list and forgot to remove it.
Mea culpa if this causes bad feelings for anyone.
Christian Theune wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can you please move the discussion back to the list? I don't see a
> r
Hi,
can you please move the discussion back to the list? I don't see a
reason why this should be discussed in private.
Thanks,
Christian
Pjotr Prins wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Thanks for clarifying. I am concerned ZOPE3 has been an engineering
> group and the focus remains thus.
>
> I was del
Hi,
Pjotr Prins wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:11:21PM -0800, Christian Theune wrote:
>> I don't think so. The Zope 3 wiki was built up as, and still is, a resource
>> for the development *of* Zope 3. We shouldn't
>
> So according to you ZOPE3 is still an engineering project as the main
> W
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:11:21PM -0800, Christian Theune wrote:
> I don't think so. The Zope 3 wiki was built up as, and still is, a resource
> for the development *of* Zope 3. We shouldn't
So according to you ZOPE3 is still an engineering project as the main
Wiki/Documentation site is basicall
Neat!
I saw those possibilities in the last days already and think it's a nice
idea to manage them there.
How did you make the existing specs appear there so quickly?
Guess I'll play around a bit with the management of the series.
One thing that we should consider: Do we want to handle Zope 3/Z