Gary Poster wrote:
On Aug 23, 2005, at 8:07 PM, Michel Pelletier wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 18:04 -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
The relationship between ZODB content objects, their int id as
provided by the pertinent intid utility, and a (theoretical)
corresponding RDF URI is what I'm having
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 10:07 -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
I'm interested in contemplating RDF as a full catalog solution for
Zope, at least as a thought experiment.
Great!
Note that the use of bound variables also removes the need for brains.
We actually don't have catalog brains in Zope
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 23:24 -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
Right. Well in this case we would provide just a very simple
interface
facade that had no effect when run in an environment with no
zope.interface (ie, catch the ImportError, null-out the facade) or
hook
into zope.interface if
On Aug 29, 2005, at 11:24 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
On Aug 26, 2005, at 3:03 AM, Daniel Krech wrote:
On Aug 25, 2005, at 3:10 PM, Michel Pelletier wrote:
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 14:32 -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
see what he thinks. I wonder how lite the component kernel
can go.
The only
On Aug 26, 2005, at 3:03 AM, Daniel Krech wrote:
On Aug 25, 2005, at 3:10 PM, Michel Pelletier wrote:
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 14:32 -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
see what he thinks. I wonder how lite the component kernel
can go.
The only thing I have in mind is the interface package, which is
On Aug 26, 2005, at 2:56 AM, Daniel Krech wrote:
On Aug 25, 2005, at 2:32 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
On Aug 24, 2005, at 9:13 PM, Michel Pelletier wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 12:39 -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
...
Since Dan is already using Twisted in his app server, maybe he'd be
willing to let
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 14:32 -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
see what he thinks. I wonder how lite the component kernel can go.
The only thing I have in mind is the interface package, which is what
Twisted uses. That's all we would need. zope.component needs
zope.interface, zope.testing,
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 12:49 -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
Michel (and anyone else with experience with RDFLib on the list), I
recently looked at RDFLib (http://rdflib.net/) and came away (after
an hour or so) with a good first impression.
Great. I've cc:ed Dan Krech, the lead rdflib developer
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 18:04 -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
The relationship between ZODB content objects, their int id as
provided by the pertinent intid utility, and a (theoretical)
corresponding RDF URI is what I'm having a hard time not making hacky
in my mind. I'll think about it some
