Dieter Maurer wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote at 2006-3-2 18:44 +0100:
...
I worry about losing brands we've worked on hard to establish. While
many people do not understand the difference between Zope 2 and Zope 3,
many others have heard about Zope 3 and they know it is not Zope 2.
I do not
On 3/3/06, Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MS renames its core technologies every few years (at least)
Eh... no they don't. It's been called "MS Windows", and "MS Office"
and the like for like 15-20 years now. :-) In fact I can't think of
any case where Microsoft have renamed any tech
Lennart Regebro wrote at 2006-3-2 20:39 +0100:
> ...
>2. Zope3 may also get slightly streamlined, so that Zope3 is what is
>needed to run Zope2 but not more. That means that Zope3 would lose the
>ZMI.
I would consider this a severe loss.
The ZMI provides menu guided operations.
This is much easie
Martijn Faassen wrote at 2006-3-2 18:44 +0100:
> ...
>I worry about losing brands we've worked on hard to establish. While
>many people do not understand the difference between Zope 2 and Zope 3,
> many others have heard about Zope 3 and they know it is not Zope 2.
I do not understand the "loss
On Thursday 02 March 2006 14:39, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> 4. We develop TTW development tools for Zope3. I think me and Jim both
> agree we should have these. I think me and Jim has a completely
> different vision of what they should be. :)
Note that WebDev is *a* R&D project aimed at discovering
On Thursday 02 March 2006 12:44, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> I would suggest stability in our message for now. I believe the current
> situation is not ideal, but workable. Let's not rename things just when
> we've finally, in 2005, reached a situation when at least core
> developers on Zope 2 and Zop
I'm so confused by all the names and stuff that I find it hard to
answer to what somebody is saying, so I will just state *my* vision of
the future.
Technology-wise:
1. Zope2 uses more and more of Zope3s technologies. Anything that can
be merged gets merged. That means security, pagetemplates an
Hi there,
I've been thinking a lot about the various things said in the vision
discussion. Lots of people said things I agree with, but other things
were said that make me worry a lot (losing brand-identity and useful
names), and so on. Here I sketch out some of my thoughts.
Reading back thr