Re: [Zope3-Users] Are we following the flow (Python 3)

2009-01-22 Thread David Pratt
Hi Shane, Roger and list. Personally, I think there needs to be prioritization myself beginning with the essential packages to zca. zodb would be next. I am not sure about anything else. My feeling is the rest might need to be considered legacy. It would be unrealistic to move forward with

Re: [Zope3-Users] MultiWidget

2009-01-22 Thread Christian Lück
Hi Roger, Roger Ineichen wrote: > Hi Christian > >> Betreff: [Zope3-Users] MultiWidget >> >> Hi, >> >> the new MultiWidget in z3c.form is great! I like the way >> input errors are reported. Thank you for this! >> >> To help the users of my app a little I was thinking about >> conditions for the

Re: [Zope3-Users] MultiWidget

2009-01-22 Thread Christian Lück
Christian Lück wrote: > Hi Roger, > > Roger Ineichen wrote: >> Hi Christian >> >>> Betreff: [Zope3-Users] MultiWidget >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> the new MultiWidget in z3c.form is great! I like the way >>> input errors are reported. Thank you for this! >>> >>> To help the users of my app a little I was

Re: [Zope3-Users] Are we following the flow (Python 3)

2009-01-22 Thread Shane Hathaway
David Pratt wrote: > Hi Shane, Roger and list. Personally, I think there needs to be > prioritization myself beginning with the essential packages to zca. zodb > would be next. I am not sure about anything else. My feeling is the rest > might need to be considered legacy. It would be unrealistic