Hi there,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
> Thanks for all the assistance.
>
> On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 18:05 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>
>> Yes, you do create new schema fields by subclassing from Field.
>>
>> It's just that we saw you put
Hey,
>> To debug this
>> problem, a developer will need the smallest possible example of code
>> that demonstrates the problem. That means, I take it, just 2 schemas
>> and a single form. Describe briefly what you expect to happen and what
>> in fact happens. If that example can be done *without*
Hey,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 22:05 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>
>> Okay, I'll take another look then and look at ObjectRef. Ah, yes, Dan
>> pointed out to you that you are using a zope.schema.Field in a class
>&g
Hi there,
I've also assigned this bug to the Grok project so we can track it there
too; launchpad makes this easy. I'm sorry your bug still didn't get fixed.
It would help general understanding of the bug if you made it as easy to
reproduce as possible, such as with a minimal buildout that demo
Hi there,
Another high-level response. I actually *hope* that the port Zope
packages to Jython project will be accepted for the Google Summer of
Code. If it does, the python versions of this code will be given a
good workout by the student, which should benefit other porting
projects as well. cc-i
Hi there,
[FYI, before discussion starts here]
I've written a new mail with much the same content to zope-dev. Well,
it'll appear in a minute. Please take discussion there.
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail
Hey,.
[included: Christian Theune (z3c.sqlalchemy), cc-ed to Andreas Jung
(z3c.sqlalchemy), Laurence Row (collective.lead)]
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Christian Theune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 05:22:31PM -0400, Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote:
[snip]
> > I can't get
Hey,
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Chris Shenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Kudos to the Grok team for such a pleasant product, and for some REALLY
> good tutorials. Thanks!
Thanks for the kudos! I hope to see you on grok-dev if you aren't there already!
Regards,
Martijn
Hey,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> From your argument about cumbersone logins to mail accounts it
> appears you dislike mailing lists because you use some free web-based
> email provider. Well, get a real email account and use it with a rea
Hey,
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Derek Richardson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Anyone else who has interest and would like to contribute questions,
> ideas, or code is welcome to contact me, as well, or continue discussion
> here (please cc me, since I don't regularly read this list
Hey,
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 4, 2008, at 1:52 AM, Yuan HOng wrote:
[snip]
> > Are there any preferred
> > way to set up a production environment now?
>
> zope.server is fairly well proven. I'd like to see people try the
> cherrypy serv
Hi there,
I haven't had much experience with blobs yet (I hope to start working
with this in the near future).
>From my reading of the blobfile docs, I think the "File" object
defined in it is *not* a schema field, such as the
one you use from megrok.form. These things are different things
altoge
Hey,
On Feb 5, 2008 3:49 PM, Hermann Himmelbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At first, thanks to the newest Zope-3.4.0c1 release. I just installed it from
> the tarball and it seems to work.
>
> However, I'm still somehow technically overwhelmed by installing Zope3 the
> egg-style way - maybe it'
Hey,
On Feb 1, 2008 11:52 PM, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephan Richter wrote:
> > On Friday 01 February 2008, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> >> http://www.openplans.org/projects/zorg-redux
> >
> > This project does not seem to be public.
>
&g
Hey,
On Feb 1, 2008 8:59 PM, Paul Carduner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I think the website is one of the huge impediments to joining the Zope
> community. When you compare zope.org to all the other web framework
> websites like django, turbogears, and RoR, it is pretty clear why
> people
Hey,
On Feb 1, 2008 6:11 PM, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 01 February 2008, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> > http://www.openplans.org/projects/zorg-redux
>
> This project does not seem to be public.
I don't know how it's been setup, but if y
Hey,
On Feb 1, 2008 6:04 PM, Christophe Combelles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> The transition seems now achieved and the most important thing is to have a
> dedicated web site with clear information, so that there are new users, and
> new
> contributors. When someone goes to the zope.org h
Hey,.
On Feb 1, 2008 4:09 PM, David Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> It might be nice for the marketing of zope to give each set of eggs a
> nice name. Just using familiar mozilla names as an illustration, see how
> nice zope-thunderbird or zope-firefox look. So do away with the kgs in
>
Hey,
On Dec 7, 2007 1:54 PM, Christophe Combelles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> 2- Then I'm trying to create a form for a single Object field. I've understood
> that this case should be handled by a subform. So I could create such a thing
> by
> using a template for the main form, and a sub
Hey,
On Nov 5, 2007 4:41 AM, Benji York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Darryl Cousins wrote:
> > Has anyone experienced duplicate emails being sent using
> > IQueuedMailDelivery?
>
> We've seen this when you have more than one process (or thread)
> attempting to deliver messages from a single maildi
Benji York wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
2. How many packages should be controlled in this index? I think we
should definitely add packages from z3c and the zc namespace.
What is the motivation to include non-controlled packages? I suppose it
is to let people use those packages with (in this
Vinny wrote:
Florian Lindner wrote:
One thing still missing is a good name. A name that quickly comes to
my mind is zBlog but which is not very fancy.
What ideas have you for Zope3 blog package, what would you choose?
If you are using any of the 'Grok' stuff then you might
consider 'Grog'.
Hello,
Adam Groszer wrote:
I'd like to ask your opinion, your experiences about searching and
filtering in quite large object DBs.
We need to add search and filter functions to our current app, where
the user might be able to create quite _sophisticated_ filter criterias.
(The app is a pure Z3 a
Jeff Shell wrote:
... now what?
I just tried moving some work over to Zope 3.3. Already things are
blowing up. That's fine - things can change a little bit. But is there
any information on what really changed besides CHANGES.txt and the
little list of bullet items on the release information page
Ivan Horvath wrote:
Dear Martijn,
thank you for your answer.
the query.Text (TextIndex) search is working now
but i miss the "query.NotText" - i mean to search for NOT a value
how this could be possible?
I'm not sure whether the text index actually supports this behavior;
hurry.query doesn't
Fred Drake wrote:
On 9/26/06, Baiju M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If this is a _bug fix_ and not a _feature_, can we port it to 3.3 also.
Of cource in 3.3.1 release only.
I think so. I've got to get some sleep now, but feel free to go ahead
and backport it if like.
If this is really a bugfix
Ivan Horvath wrote:
Dear All,
i have to provide some filter function in our system.
i've checked the hurry.query solution
e.g.
obj1.property = "As Built Documentation"
obj2.property = "Planning Documentation"
obj3.property = "As Built Drawing"
i would like to filter my objects in the following
Stephan Richter wrote:
[snip]
4) workflow:
Where is zope.app.workflow?
It has never been released with Zope 3, just as an add-on package. People are
now encouraged to use zope.wfmc and zope.app.wfmc. There is also a z3lab
extension specifically for document workflows.
If you ar
Thierry Florac wrote:
[snip]
I had the same problem in my french site where we use many accentuated
characters.
The solution I use until now is just to switch my Python interpreter to
use "UTF-8" as default encoding, via the "site.py" file of my Python
distribution...
If it works for you, so be
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 8/25/06, Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I actually think it would be *nice*, if not at all essential, to have a
common namespace for community work. For such a common namespace "z3c"
is a bit unwieldier than something like "zor
Stephan Richter wrote:
[snip]
Also, z3c
does not try to be the holy grail of community work. It is just another
namespace and I think this should be accepted.
I actually think it would be *nice*, if not at all essential, to have a
common namespace for community work. For such a common namesp
Benji York wrote:
Stephan's ZSCP proposal suggests using the package name "z3c" for
"community" packages. IOW, packages that aren't part of a larger
collection like lovely.*, zc.*, etc.. There are currently several z3c
packages in existence.
The zope3.org packages currently use the package
Gary Poster wrote:
Zope Corporation is happy to announce a number of newly open-sourced
packages. All are in use, in development, or both.
[snip long list]
Awesome! And thanks for this announcement! And here Infrae's with only 3
hurry packages last year - I feel totally inadequate. :)
Echoi
Jim Washington wrote:
This is probably a bit premature, but I have been doing some thinking
about reordering/batching of large sets.
My current (not-quite-ready-for-prime-time) solution involves
factoradics, and I have done a bit of a write-up on my blog,
http://blog.hill-street.net/?p=5 .
Benji York wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
Note that I am -1 for including zc.table at this stage. I feel that it
needs some more thought and real-life usage. Note: I use zc.table *a
lot*!
I'm +1 on your -1. It's a bit early yet. Plus the eggification of 3.4
will hopefully reduce the need to
Ron Bickers wrote:
I was trying to implement the new annotations factory in
zope/annotation/README.txt but I'm getting a ForbiddenAttribute
__annotations__ error when I try to view an editform for the annotations.
Before, I had configured a trusted adapter, but since (I think) an adapter
dire
baiju m wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone send me an example app where hurry.query is used?
or is there any svn public repository with hurry.query examples?
The README.txt is enough for getting started, but I am looking better
patterns for catalog usage.
Recently Infrae released the Document Library.
Mohsen Moeeni wrote:
Looking at ICatalog interface, I could not figure out
how can I request some simple and common operations
from my catalog.
- Sorting on a field index.
- Returning the first N-th results (Hopefully without
awakening all catalog records - if that makes any sense)
- Definin
Frank Burkhardt wrote:
[snip]
Does anyone have an Idea how to do this or do I have to modify
the TextIndex?
Idea: Write an adater which Adapts IMyObject to ISearchableEN. This
Adapter can be a function which only does the adaption chain and returns
the Adapter to ISearchableEn adapter.
Thank
Laurence Rowe wrote:
Once I added the package includes, adding
for c in columns:
directlyProvides(c, zc.table.interfaces.ISortableColumn)
did the trick.
I'd love to have a look at your alternate sorting implementation, though
will need to get checking privileges before merging. (I
Martin Aspeli wrote:
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 11:49:31 -, Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
This should be Zope3 as it is now. A couple of things can go away.
Maybe the rotterdam skin, I don't know. Definitely the default Folder
objects and such. People, especially Zope2 people, think
Peter Bengtsson wrote:
Wanna watch a 700Kb screencast showing the pre-alpha ZCML Configurator?
http://www.peterbe.com/zope/zcmlconfigurator/
It all looks very cool! Essentially you wrote a browser-based custom XML
editor for ZCML, right? Could you sketch out a usecase of how people
would use
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
I'm not sure shuffling the hype and Zope 3 marketing conversations to
zope-web is a good idea. I'm not trying to fix zope.org (eek), and
I'm not trying to improve the Zope 2 image (though that would be nice
too). I, and I think others, are
Hey,
No, the marketing talk should stay wherever it is. Only the people who
want to fix the marketing situation by working on building a better
zope.org should go to zope-web.
If you want to make sure that the new zope.org is going to work with
your marketing suggestions, you'd better help o
Joel Moxley wrote:
[snip]
These are good points. I'm not convinced myself yet we should leave
zope.org as is and do the marketing for Zope 2 - I think Zope.org is
currently mostly anti-marketing for whatever Zope we're talking about.
That said, getting community interest in making something n
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Yes. Rest assured my ambition is to keep ambitions as low as possible.
:) Otherwise nothing will happen.
The front page of Zope.org doesn't show the activity around Z3 at all.
That wouln't cost anything to start to add a few z3 links in
Max M wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Alternatively, we could use our energy to actually work together on a
new website instead of competing. There's a zope-web mailing list,
after all, so go and talk there. This would have my preference.
If you want to fix the Zope 2 website at the same
Hi there,
Gary Poster wrote:
[competition]
+1. I think the requirement to have enough people submitting is very
important, though. No competition anounced unless we get some idea that
we'll actually have enough competitors, otherwise we end up looking
silly ("what happened to the Zope marketin
Hi there,
Just to drop a note that I think a discussion about a potential brand
name for Zope 3 is far less important than actually fixing our website
and presenting Zope 3 (and Zope 2 for that matter) in a better way.
Perhaps we can better redirect our energies to that than to have long
(bu
Adam Groszer wrote:
Hello,
I had some time to finalize the widgets overview.
You can download it from here in various formats:
http://www.zope.org/Members/adamg/widget
Wow, thanks, this looks really cool!
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope3-users mailin
Jeff Shell wrote:
[snip lots of good stuff about configuration in python code and its
drawbacks]
But if that were a route one
decided to use, one would have to lay down VERY strict rules.
Otherwise we lose all the benefits of the Component Architecture and
start heading back into a free-for-al
Jeff Shell wrote:
Yes, it's hurry.file. What's Tramline?
http://www.infrae.com/newsitems/tramline_0_4_release
http://www.infrae.com/products/tramline
http://faassen.n--tree.net/blog/view/weblog/2005/11/11/0
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope3-users mailing
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jeff Shell wrote:
I was using it in some custom views for HurryFile based images. I've
removed it since I started testing our code against Zope 3.2. Right
now I just return the hurryfile binary data with a return statement
(one big chunk), but am looking forwa
Jeff Shell wrote:
I was using it in some custom views for HurryFile based images. I've
removed it since I started testing our code against Zope 3.2. Right
now I just return the hurryfile binary data with a return statement
(one big chunk), but am looking forward to knowing how to return long
outp
Jim Fulton wrote:
It is valid both to:
- Declare an interface for a built-in type and
register adapters for that interface, and to
- Register adapters for builtin types directly.
I can't promise that this works now, but it ought to work.
I'm 90% sure that it does in fact work, at least in Zo
Milind Khadilkar wrote:
In light of these insights, I feel the Zope home page should be re-drafted
so as to present alternatives clearly to newcomers. Currently, Zope 3 is not
presented prominently, causing newcomers to start with Zope 2 by default.
Yes, an effort to improve the web presence o
Johan Carlsson wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
Does you code for adding catalogs and adding fields get called
in the same request?
Yes, it's done when an application root is installed.
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Johan Carlsson wrote:
Anyone had any success with ZCatalog in Zope 3?
Sure. I'm not sure what the problem is but I see you get a lot of
replies. We (Infrae) certainly got it working without having to patch
anything.
Um, the setup code we use it something like:
def _registerUtility(context
Milind Khadilkar wrote:
Is it correct to say that one of the major objectives of Zope 3 as opposed
to zope-x ( viz. compatibility with Zope 2, or at least an easy way for
importing products from zope 2) has not been achieved?
Unfortunately the whole 'X' story was always interpreted differentl
Martin Margo wrote:
[snip]
How do I make /+/AddConferenceGoer.html= publicly available
without being prompted for a password? Is there a configuration file
somewhere I can set this up?
I've ran into this one. The problem is that the '+' view registered by
Zope 3 is not allowing access by peopl
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 10:25, Johan Carlsson wrote:
How far has the development of 3.2 come?
That question does not make much sense, We are switching to timely
releases with 3.2. You can see the implemented features in CHANGES.txt.
I don't entirely understand wh
Hey,
Jim Vine wrote:
Thanks a lot for the pointer. I have upgraded to Zope
3.1b (with only minor difficulty).
Note that I'm currently sitting on an implementation of a more
sophisticated query engine for the Zope 3 catalog. When I find time I'll
release it so others can play with it. This w
Stephan Richter wrote:
[snip]
Then there are of course various Five-based projects, but I am not familiar
with them. Can anyone enlighten me here? Also, if I forgot any project,
please tell me about it! It does not have to be a commercial product either!
Concerning Five projects, one project
.
I found at: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2003-September/008601.html
that Mr. Martijn Faassen wrote zcml.rnc to use emacs to validete ZCML files. I
found the zcml.rnc in the zope3/doc folder, but I couldn't set it up in emacs.
How should I tell emacs to use the zcml.rnc file to validat
Five 1.0 released!
==
The Five team is happy to release Five 1.0. Five is a Zope 2 product
that allows you to integrate Zope 3 technologies into Zope 2, today.
There are no big feature additions compared to Five 0.3, but does
include significant bugfixes, along with some minor tweak
Andreas Jung wrote:
Are they any plannings for Z3 sprints before or after Europython?
Not that I know of. I'd be interested in attending one, especially if it
were in one room with other sprinters, like last year, though I cannot
commit to sprinting yet.
Regards,
Martijn
66 matches
Mail list logo
