On Monday 06 February 2006 01:15, Brad Allen wrote:
By new website, do you mean a Zope 3 advocacy site, or a general
documentation site? Making a separate site for advocacy seems like
a no-brainer (ala Pythonology.org), but the documentation site is
another matter. Have the Zope 3 core
On Saturday 04 February 2006 14:00, Brad Allen wrote:
I won't have any time to volunteer for such a project
for several weeks, but I could do it during the upcoming
Zope 3 sprint at PyCon (my skill is not great enough to
contribute to Zope 3 source code, but I can
work on documentation and/or
At 6:11 AM -0500 2/5/06, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Saturday 04 February 2006 14:00, Brad Allen wrote:
I won't have any time to volunteer for such a project
for several weeks, but I could do it during the upcoming
Zope 3 sprint at PyCon (my skill is not great enough to
contribute to Zope 3
Here's example of someone who the Zope site has chased off:
http://online.effbot.org/#20060203
Excerpt:
(And I'm not so sure about Zope, really . It feels stuck in 1998, way
too often. Reading zope.org is like discovering that you clicked on
the wrong elevator button, and ended up in a
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 14:40:56 -, Graham Stratton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with those who have said that Zope3 should have its own website.
If our aim is to make it clear to people that this is something new,
then that site needs a completely different design to the existing Zope
Martin Aspeli wrote:
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:12:27 -, Stephan Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having said that, I feel very strongly that built Zope version 3 and
nothing
more or less. And I feel that a name change would betray me and my
intentions.
Well, Joel didn't suggest a name
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 06:17:49 -0800, Benji York
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW: zope3.org and zope3.com are owned by Zope Corp. and I would assume
are being transfered to the Foundation. zope3.net and zope3.info appear
to be controlled by (different) domain squatters. ICANN mediation would
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:42:25 -, Stephan Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 02 February 2006 15:01, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Philipp W and others have commented on Zope 3's utter lack of marketing
(anyone been to zope.org lately?) and how it is probably hurting its
adoption.
On Thursday 02 February 2006 15:48, Martin Aspeli wrote:
I am pretty sure there is a SOAP implementation for Zope 3 and it is in
svn.zope.org.
You missed my point (unless that was dry humour)...
With all the discussion about the Cubed project today, I guess I have not much
humor left in
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:12:27 -, Stephan Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having said that, I feel very strongly that built Zope version 3 and
nothing
more or less. And I feel that a name change would betray me and my
intentions.
Well, Joel didn't suggest a name change, he suggested
On Thu February 2 2006 16:05, Stephan Richter wrote:
Yeah, but honestly I don't care. If people choose a technology on name
recognition and not on technical merit, then it is their bad. However, I
question the RoR hype. I wonder whether big companies seriously
considering it; it has
Ron Bickers wrote:
Today, I see the mess that a Zope 2 site can turn in to, so I started looking
at Zope 3 again. The release announcements say it's ready for production
use, but the website has no promotion of it whatsoever. You have to dig
several levels deep to see any mention that it's
12 matches
Mail list logo
