Greetings,
I'm presented with the following situation:
I am creating a schema for a wine degustation.
One of the the fields describing the wine, the colour of the wine
(field: wine_colour), is implemented like a Choice field.
Red, white and roseƩ wines (field: wine_type) have different possible
sha
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Massimiliano della Rovere
wrote:
> One of the the fields describing the wine, the colour of the wine
> (field: wine_colour), is implemented like a Choice field.
> Red, white and roseƩ wines (field: wine_type) have different possible
> shades of colour and I have one
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 13:57 +0200, Massimiliano della Rovere wrote:
> 2) split the schema into two pages: in the first page, and thus stage,
> you define the wine colour, in the second the associated vocabulary is
> used. I do not like it because I want all the data describing the
> degustative ex
[talking to myself again] :-)
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 09:28 -0300, Tim Cook wrote:
> Unfortunately they
> haven't published it yet but if you have a login on grok.zope.org I
> think I can share it with you.
I just discovered that I can share it with all logged in users.
http://grok.zope.org/docu