On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 10:50 PM, David Goldsmith <[email protected]>wrote:
> "Direct Deposit": the purpose of the code is to produce code; therefore, > it seems reasonable that a user might want to write their results to > Project Hosting instead of Drive. However, it sounds like you're implying > that to do that, my code would need to exploit an API into (at least) one > of the VCS's > exactly. > regardless, and thus it could (indeed, would need to) interact with GPH > via that "intermediary." (It would be nice if it could be less complicated > than that, but then I guess if the user doesn't want VCS support, then they > might as well be using Drive?) > 1) everyone should ber using a VCS for their code anyway. 2) But you could hide the VCS from teh user anyway if you wanted to -- it would simply be the protocol you used to push and pull the files from another server. -- Christopher Barker, PhD Python Language Consulting - Teaching - Scientific Software Development - Desktop GUI and Web Development - wxPython, numpy, scipy, Cython
