Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
[snip]
> The difference between updates and rawhide is that updates get official QA
> testing and we don't put known broken stuff in updates.
>
> That said, just because rawhide packages aren't QA-tested all the time
> doesn't mean they don't work. I've been using the rawhide bind package on
> my DNS for about a month without any problems (and I've updated to the
> package because I'm convinced it's the best bind package we've had so
> far).
I know, I know. The point is, you shouldn't just point people at RawHide
saying "Get your updates there." without a BIG FAT WARNING(tm).
> If you're looking for something between updates and rawhide, take a look
> at http://www.linux-easy.com/rh-updates/ - it's in no way official or
> associated with any guarantees, but it usually works.
Thanks, I'll take a look.
--
"Jump. Jump, now!"
-- Kosh to Sheridan in Babylon 5:"Z'ha'dum"
IRCNet & DALNet: #babylon5-pl | SF Homepage *under reconstruction*
http://home.elka.pw.edu.pl/~dmierzej | Linux registered user #134951.
_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
