"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Thomas Dodd wrote:
> >but NT wants stuff in the right place. You can only boot from
> >NTFS (even in NT) if it is the first partition (on the first
> >drive I think). Other partitions have to be FAT, and not FAT32.
>
> This is not. NT can boot from any primary or secondary
> partition. The restriction is that IIRC the boot partition must
> be 4Gb or less and be below 1024 cyls. It can boot from either
> FAT16 or NTFS and NT does not ever require an NTFS partition.
I rember some other restrictions on booting a NTFS
filesystem with NT4. I had NT on hdb1 and NT wanted
ntldr on a FAT partition, Win95 was on hda2 and
linux scattered about on hda, hdb, and hdc.
I may have had someother problem that led to ntldr
on a fat partition, but when I installed NT on hdb1
with NTFS, it said I needed a FAT partition on
hda to do it (using NT's names for the drives :)
-Thomas
_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list