Running this on my machine yields the following: libcss-0.1.0-1 omi-0.1.0-0.20010303.rh62 oms-0.1.2-2
Why install documentation into two different directories? Is the documentation in /usr/doc not intended to stick around after upgrades or something? Thanks. Erik Troan wrote: >On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 20:12:49 -0500 >"Michael Stack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>It doesn't appear to be a symlink on my system. /usr/doc on my system >>has just a few directories, where /usr/share/doc has quite a few. >> >>FYI, mine is a 7.1 install - not an upgrade. >> > >I'd see where those files are coming from first... Something like > > fine /usr/doc -type f | xargs rpm -qf | sort -u > >might be interesting. > >Erik > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >| "Amazingly, there are significant numbers of 30-something women now who | >| want to learn how to box - something that most sensible American men gave | >| up years ago." - New York Times Magazine | > > > >_______________________________________________ >Seawolf-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list > _______________________________________________ Seawolf-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
