Matthias Saou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Once upon a time, Trond wrote : > > > It is a separately maintained branch, and currently the best one > > available - gcc3 was both very delayed and rushed. Also, gcc3 is > > binary compatible with all other gcc releases (including 2.96RH) for > > C++ so using it wouldn't be an option even if it was ready. > > I suppose that was supposed to read "gcc3 is binary *IN*compatible for > C++", right? ;-)
Doh - of course. No gcc has been compatible with other gccs in the C++ area yet (and gcc3 wasn't the start of a new trend here either... 3.1 might be) -- Trond Eivind Glomsr�d Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ Seawolf-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
