On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:38:14 +0200 Florian Weimer wrote: > * Francesco Poli: > > > Another possible misuse of this same kind of tag: > > > > * egroupware 1.2-1.dfsg-1 needed, have 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 for > > CVE-2006-2016 > > 1.2-1.dfsg-1 is in experimental only. I think this one is correct in > principle (especially if an upload of essentially that version > unstable is expected), except that we usually do not track > experimental.
I'm not sure I understand correctly. Are you basically saying that the testing security holes page[1] is not accurate anymore? Joey, could you please clarify if your page generation script can take into account the difference between "fixed in experimental" and "fixed in unstable", despite showing identical lines? [1] http://spohr.debian.org/~joeyh/testing-security.html -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) ...................................................................... Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpEB3uXvIpRf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Secure-testing-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/secure-testing-team
