I thought all video conferencing apps used UDP or UDO?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sadler, Connie J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: James Paterson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Firewall Friendly Video Conferencing
>
>
>
> But some forms of traffic are much worse than others - I'd
> rather have inbound ftp, for example, which can be
> controlled, than UDP, which offers up a much bigger risk...
> that's the problem with Netmeeting, from what I understand -
> it's the UDO protocol that is difficult to manage.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:59 AM
> To: Sadler, Connie J
> Cc: James Paterson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Firewall Friendly Video Conferencing
>
>
>
> Any application you use will potentially make you
> vulnerable to exploits being sent to that application/port
> which is opened up in the firewall. So that is why you need
> to be careful on exactly what applications get used on your
> LAN. If you open up a certain port, you run the risk of
> unintended traffic coming into your network through that
> port. Firewalls themselves cannot distinguish between bad
> traffic and good traffic going through a port you opened up.
> That's where getting some form of IDS on your network will
> help you ensure only good traffic is coming/going through your LAN.
>
> Cavell McDermott
> Domino Admin
> APW Ltd. - Texas Campus
> 214-343-1400 - Main
> 214-355-2039 - Helpdesk
> 214-341-9950 - Fax
> http://www.apw.com
>
>
>
>
> "Sadler,
>
> Connie J" To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> James Paterson
> <csadler@bnl. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> gov> cc:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE:
> Firewall Friendly
> Video Conferencing
> 11/10/2001
>
> 06:43 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Doesn't Netmeeting behind firewalls still make the clients
> vulnerable to exploits?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:43 PM
> To: James Paterson
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Firewall Friendly Video Conferencing
>
>
>
> Lotus Sametime.. But you incur the expense of a Domino
> license. I've
> also had good success with Netmeeting with both parties being
> behind firewalls.
>
> Cavell McDermott
> Domino Admin
> APW Ltd. - Texas Campus
> 214-343-1400 - Main
> 214-355-2039 - Helpdesk
> 214-341-9950 - Fax
> http://www.apw.com
>
>
>
>
> James Paterson
>
> <jpaterson@datam To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> irror.com> cc:
>
> Subject:
> Firewall Friendly
> Video Conferencing
> 11/08/2001 03:55
>
> PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Does anyone know of a good firewall friendly desktop video
> conferencing product?
>
> Thanks
> J.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
