Frederick, At 2002/03/22/15:22 -0500 Garbrecht, Frederick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I apologize if this is a hopelessly stupid question, but I don't > really understand the relative merits of using PGP for email > authentication & encryption versus using Microsoft's implementation > of s/mime and digital signatures.
I'm assuming that Microsoft's implementation of s/mime and digital signatures is not open source. You might want to consider an open source alternative if any exists for wintel platforms. That way, the source is out in the community and subject to scrutiny by folks whose primary motivation is the integrity of the code. David -- Live in a world of your own, but always welcome visitors.
msg05343/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
