I recieved one of the mailings. Fortunately it's been reported, and Verisign
is supposed to have stopped sending these out via US Mail. Email I'm not
sure of.

Links:

http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/05/16/1356216&mode=thread&tid=123



-----Original Message-----
From: Jay D. Dyson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:23 AM
To: Steve Sobol
Cc: Chris Santerre; Security-Basics (E-mail)
Subject: Re: (Verisign) Misleading mailing is not a good way to get
customers.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Steve Sobol wrote: 

> > Complaints can be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Complaints SHOULD be sent to the US Postal Inspectors. This probably
> qualifies as mail fraud.

        I'm not sure, but I was under the impression that the mailing in
question was via e-mail.  If that's accurate, then the USPS is pretty much
out of the loop.

        And even if it was a snail-mailing, it's no different than the
deluge of paper junk mail I get from Register.Com all the time.  (And no,
none of my two-dozen-odd domains are registered with Register.Com.) 

        It's a dog-eat-dog world out there, folks...and every business
that staked its future on the 'net is wearing Milk Bone underwear.  Small
wonder the advertising tactics are becoming significantly more aggressive.

- -Jay

  (    (                                                          _______
  ))   ))   .--"There's always time for a good cup of coffee"--.   >====<--.
C|~~|C|~~| (>------ Jay D. Dyson -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------<) |    = |-'
 `--' `--'  `-- I'll be diplomatic...when I run out of ammo. --'  `------'

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (TreacherOS)
Comment: See http://www.treachery.net/~jdyson/ for current keys.

iD8DBQE8/QVzGI2IHblM+8ERAjPKAJ98Jqy3NZPXSo0zZ/HGq7aZBVMrXQCfcjra
gP0jmMij/Gxt3To9Z7WqpQE=
=1C0v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to