There are a lot of ways to look at this Foundstone ordeal but obviously there is the black and white legality of things. JD Glaser (NT Objectives) was the main architect and engineer behind any program that Foundstone did. Obviously when he decided to leave Foundstone, and take a few of the Foundstone engineers with him, to start back up NT Objectives, he was breaking some contracts he had with Foundstone. This is what all the legal matters seem to be about.
If JD Glaser (NTObjectives) had legal contracts not allowing him to compete, reuse code (IP restrictions), nor work against Foundstone (by taking some engineers from Foundstone to NTObjectives) then of course he is breaking the law and Foundstone has all the right to take him to court and sue the pants off of him. I think all of the underlying aspects of this is what is the most funny. I mean come on what technology are they suing NTObjectives for? Last I heard NTObjectives "Fire & Water" tool was something that any decent programmer could put together in a weekend. Is Foundstone really suing over "state of the art" connect() scanner code and XML parsing? If that's the type of high-tech IP they are trying to protect then that's scary. Also, where does Foundstone even use any of this technology? Last I heard Foundstone's Foundscan product (or was it service?) was vaporware. I know that when my company looked into purchasing it we were met with nothing more than remote web demos and screen shots of something that was "coming soon." So I guess that is what I find funny in all this... that NTObjectives (JD Glaser) and Foundstone (Stuart McClure) must have had such a falling out that now there is a legal battle over who has the right to super high tech port scanner code etc... If Foundstone was doing good and was not scrambling to finish vaporware, with a now non-existent engineering team (at NTObjectives now) then I doubt we would see them suing over something as trivially simple as "Fire & Water" ... to me it seems like nothing more than childish backlash by Stuart towards JD. Do I disagree with it? Nope Foundstone has every right to sue NTObjectives. But come on doesn't everyone have better things to do? This reminds me so much of dot com style jibberish. Back to protecting my companies network and hoping the vendors creating my security software can grow up and work on better security solutions instead of petty lawsuits. -Ron CISSP,CCNE | To: SECURITY-BASICS | Subject: Re: Foundstone - keeping free tools from the public | Date: Oct 10 2002 6:14PM | Author: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | I would say, read the order, and declaration. | | This is not about withholding tools, or protecting the public, as | NTOBJECTives, Inc., would have us believe. It's about stealing | code, | algorithms, datases, etc, that Foundstone, Inc., wrote, and | protect as | trade secrets. | | NTOBJECTives is free to release the toolkit, after they prove to | the court | systems, the code is original and theirs. | | JB Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com
