When this variant first came out, I read an article on why and how it has become so popular. I remember reading that someone must be seeding this virus because by itself it could not have become so big, so fast. I honestly believe that seeding this virus is still a very active practice for whoever is responsible for this virus and that is why we continue to get hit. Perhaps, the person(s) simply backed off for awhile, but when other viruses threatened the top spot, he began to seed the virus again. Just my opinion, but there has to be some catalyst and to me that points right back at the creator.
Lisa B. Lafleur, CNE, CISSP Data Security Administrator FIRSTFED One FIRSTFED Park Swansea, MA 02777 (508) 235-1770 >>> Adam Shephard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/13/2003 11:08:34 AM >>> I have to chime in as one who has been seeing increased Klez activity as well. Only thee or four a day but, considering we were going for a period with none, it does make me curious. > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Heitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 8:31 PM > To: Eric Zatko; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: GroupWise - Guinevere - Klez.H traffic Increase > > > Eric, > > That's pretty interesting mainly because I've noticed a > definite decrease in the number of Klez hits on my scanning > gateway. <snip> > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Zatko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tue 3/11/2003 3:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: > Subject: GroupWise - Guinevere - Klez.H traffic Increase > <snip> > > We are getting more and more e-mail each and every day > that is being blocked/cleaned/stripped of attachments > containing the Klez.H virus. <snip> >
