Or it could also have been of a legitimate corporate need, as im used to seeing. So when its not blatently obvious, where do you draw that line ?? Nothing i read here in the replies is any different then you could find doing a little bit of googling on the web
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 13:03, Townson, Glenn A wrote: > Kelly, I applaud all of your efforts !!!! > > As a subscriber to the list if there is anything posted I am not interested > in or thought inappropriate, I ignore it. > > As a security professional the more information I have available (good or > bad) affords the opportunity to deduce my own conclusion and act > accordingly. > > "As long as technology exists, security or lack there of, will exist" > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kelly Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 12:28 PM > To: Tim Laureska > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; security-basics > Subject: RE: How to obtain a yahoo username off a computer > > > I receive posts to the list on a daily basis that appear to be questions > on how to circumvent security. Those that are so obvious are rejected > outright with standard explanation, and in some cases people respond by > rephrasing their question, indicating the legitimate purpose of such a > request, and then I approve it. That's the process. > > While I am absolutely security paranoid myself, I'm not going to pry into > the lives of anyone on this list, nor am I going to go more than just one > step beyond the obvious implications of a simple question. The answers are > out there anyway -- whether you find them on the web or Usenet (remember > newsgroups?) or on this list. The knowledge can be used for good or bad > either way, and many people here have the ability to do either quite > effectively (yet in the vast majority of cases, are *still* not black > hats). There needs to be a certain amount of leeway in this area, > considering the very nature of security discussions. > > -- > Kelly Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Moderator, Security-Basics > > On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Tim Laureska wrote: > > > Curt is absolutely right... I was amazed at how quickly people responded > > with various mechanisms to do what was originally asked... I would hope > > that the new Security Basics List administrator might pick up on this > > potential social engineering ... For all we know this could be some 13 > > year old kid trying to get into a friend's A/C (no offence meant to the > > original author).... paranoia is definitely part of the game! > > > > I finish with a question ....Is this an appropriate question for this > > list? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Curt Seeliger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 7:53 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: How to obtain a yahoo username off a computer > > > > > > There's been a variety of helpful responses to the original request now. > > > > There are good reasons for doing what he wants to do, but (and I'm in no > > > > way impuning the original poster by asking this) there are some crummy > > reasons as well. > > > > How do any of you know this isn't part of a stalking, or background info > > > > for more social engineering, or yada? Near as I know, you don't. Sure, > > this is worst case scenario, but isn't paranoia part of the game? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Evaluating SSL VPNs' Consider NEOTERIS, chosen as leader by top analysts! > The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant, > while InStat has confirmed Neoteris as the leader in marketshare. > > Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in > about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance. > > Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Evaluating SSL VPNs' Consider NEOTERIS, chosen as leader by top analysts! > The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant, > while InStat has confirmed Neoteris as the leader in marketshare. > > Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in > about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance. > > Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Evaluating SSL VPNs' Consider NEOTERIS, chosen as leader by top analysts! The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant, while InStat has confirmed Neoteris as the leader in marketshare. Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance. Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
