In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Have you actually tested the speed of the modem? I use [EMAIL PROTECTED] and i generally get an average 1.2kbps down and 3-400 up. I support over 10 machines, not users, but the machines all have a function that generates traffic. There are 3 of using them from time to time, mostly me. But its fair to say I am left with plenty of bandwidth to share. It is possible your bottle necking somewhere in your network? What kind of equipment are you using? You could setup some sort of packet filtering at the gateway that gives priority to to certain things that are important. I cant say I have ever seen anyone max out a cable connection. We run a DSL line here 6 people in the office. The line is not as fast as my cable at home yet it supports us all fine. I think you should look at your topology first, make sure theres no bottlenecking. Eliminate / filter the garbage and then give it a go. I dont see a problem setting up the VPN, but like you said you must take that traffic into consideration before deciding whether or not to purchase more bandwidth. And also read your ISPs fine print, some like comcast, are very picky about what you can do with your line. Ok thats all --chris
>Received: (qmail 2978 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2003 16:33:28 -0000 >Received: from outgoing2.securityfocus.com (205.206.231.26) > by mail.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 23 Jun 2003 16:33:28 -0000 >Received: from lists.securityfocus.com (lists.securityfocus.com [205.206.231.19]) > by outgoing2.securityfocus.com (Postfix) with QMQP > id A13BF8F35D; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:16:34 -0600 (MDT) >Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm >Precedence: bulk >List-Id: <security-basics.list-id.securityfocus.com> >List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Delivered-To: moderator for [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Received: (qmail 23729 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2003 14:33:04 -0000 >From: "Keenan Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Broadband usage statistics >Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:41:20 -0400 >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="us-ascii" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >X-Priority: 3 (Normal) >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 >Importance: Normal >In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >All, > >Is anybody aware of a survey or study of some sort that details a typical >user's broadband usage relative to the size of the pipe? > >I'm trying to roll out a remote access solution using VPN as a secure >transport into our LAN. So far in all cases, there has not been a problem >with system or pipe load. However, it was suggested the other day that some >users may have maxed-out connections (hard to imagine for a single broadband >user doing mainly email and other typical office-related work maxing out >their pipe) that would make VPN an unusable solution given the extra >overhead. > >Rather than waiting to find out and having to explain to my boss with a >red-faced "Duh" that I didn't know, I'd like to find out what percentage of >users regularly max-out their connection so I know if I'll have to come up >with some other way to secure a connection into our backoffice or if I'll >have to budget for extra bandwidth on the user's end. > >What I need is how many people or companies, on average, max-out their >connections? I don't believe that a single user with a cable modem or DSL >would ever have this problem, but how about a small organization of 5 or 10 >people? > >Some basic measurements at the last company I worked for indicated that >despite 50 users sharing a single T1 and many of them doing streaming >audio/video as well as large downloads, never went above an average 15% >utilization of a T1. > >Is that typical or was that company particularly efficient in their network >usage? > >Most of my info is not quantifiable so I'm looking for some hard facts and >figures. > >Thanks in advance for any advice/info. > >KC Smith > > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- - >Evaluating SSL VPNs' Consider NEOTERIS, chosen as leader by top analysts! >The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant, >while InStat has confirmed Neoteris as the leader in marketshare. > >Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in >about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance. > >Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Evaluating SSL VPNs' Consider NEOTERIS, chosen as leader by top analysts! The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant, while InStat has confirmed Neoteris as the leader in marketshare. Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance. Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
