Well, my question is; what the hell if I was using any of these protocols?? Didn't cisco think of that?? They should have suggested a more decent solution.
./Ghaith =============== Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 6:48 PM To: Alvaro Gordon-Escobar Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Workaround Alvaro, No. The protocol blocked by the access-list is protocol 53 not protocol TCP or protocol UDP port 53. If you need further info, let me know, -James At 09:15 7/23/2003, Alvaro Gordon-Escobar wrote: >will this access list modification prevent my internal DNS server from >updates to it self from my telco's DNS server? > >access-list 101 deny 53 any any >access-list 101 deny 55 any any >access-list 101 deny 77 any any >access-list 101 deny 103 any any >!--- insert any other previously applied ACL entries here >!--- you must permit other protocols through to allow normal >!--- traffic -- previously defined permit lists will work >!--- or you may use the permit ip any any shown here >access-list 101 permit ip any any > >Thanks in advance > >~alvaro Escobar > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- >----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
