Looks good. As you may remember, my personal preference is to use lots
of parens to clearly show what you intended, but up to you as it's
pretty clear without
return ((block != null) && (mac != null) &&
(block[0] == (byte)0xFF) && (block[1] == (byte)0xFF) &&
...
I'd ask for a test case, but it might take a while to run. ;)
Brad
On 10/28/2011 8:00 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi,
Would you please review my fix for 7106277 (Brokenness in the
seqNumberOverflow of MAC)?
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/7106277/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Xuelei
