Oh, there seems to be much more non-trivial code changes then the previous version of webrev.

I now focus on the utility class KeyLength.java:

In ReflectiveProvider, how about adding a "." at the end of package name?

Also, is the while loop really necessary in getKeyLengthMethod? Why not directly call getDeclaredMethod on the the baseClassName? If you want to make sure the current class is a subclass of the baseClassName, try isAssignableFrom.

As for the test, I was thinking that you can add a unit test on the KeyLength class itself.

Thanks
Max


On 11/17/2011 11:14 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Sean, could you also review the fix? I plan to backport the fix to JDK
7, so that the key size constraints for both JSSE and CertPath can work
with PKCS11 and MSCPI.

updated webrev:
http://javaweb.us.oracle.com/~xf138604/bugbios/7106773/webrev.01/

In the new webrev, I add a new KeyLength class under sun.security.util.
I think it may be useful for other models.

On 11/11/2011 2:33 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
SSLContextVersion.java:

    typo: suported ->  supported

Updated.

DisabledAlgorithmConstraints.java:

    When can size == 0? Why it's not allowed?

It's a line of dummy code in case the get key size method return 0.

    Yes, I think the reflection calls should be wrapped in doPriv

    Please also consider keys from MSCAPI

Support MSCAPI now.

    Try looking at sun.misc.SharedSecrets and see if it's better
    for you. Probably not. That class is used to share non-public
    methods in public classes. Not the same case here.

SignatureAndHashAlgorithm.java:

    Is it possible to combine expected and signingKey into a single
    signingKey? Of course that means it might need to be never null
    and all key alg call it in a consistent way. I wonder if this
    is OK for you.

It not always work. For example, the key algorithm may be "EC", but the
expected algorithm may be "ECDSA".

    The RSAKey interface seems not used anywhere.

Yes, removed.

    How about changing

     288 }   // Otherwise, cannot determine the key size, prefer the most
     289     // perferable hash algorithm.

    to

     maxDigestLength = Integer.MAX_VALUE;

    then you don't need to assign -1 and check for<  0 later.

Good point.

    I would be glad if lines 302-306 can be further indented 4 spaces

    The comment on lines 268-273 is confusing, because you did calculate
    maxDigestAlgorithm for 512 bits key later.

    Personally, I prefer comments on 274-281 and codes on 284-288
    to be from a smaller keySize to bigger ones, but everything is OK.

Updated.

Test:

    I would like a unit test on DisabledAlgorithmConstraints::getKeySize.
    Hopefully the test can cover all SecretKey and PrivateKey from all
    providers with all keysizes.

Added some new tests for PKCS11 and MSCAPI.

Thanks,
Xuelei

Thanks
Max

On 11/11/2011 01:09 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi Weijun,

Are you available to review my fix for CR 7106773? The fix in JSSE part
is straightforward in that the call to
SignatureAndHashAlgorithm.getPreferableAlgorithm() needs an additional
Key parameter for RSA key exchanges. The significant change is at
sun/security/util/DisabledAlgorithmConstraints.java. I modified the code
in order to get the key size of the unextractable key in PKCS#11 device.

webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/7106773/webrev.00/

Thanks,
Xuelei

Reply via email to