On 7/3/12 7:57 AM, Weijun Wang wrote: > The current line 25 has a "#" and I prefer it to be a real empty line.
Ok, I understand now. Yes, I agree that would be a good change. --Sean > > -Max > > On 07/03/2012 07:49 PM, Sean Mullan wrote: >> On 7/2/12 11:14 PM, Weijun Wang wrote: >>> One minor thing: >>> >>> Line 25 should be empty, this starts another paragraph on providers. >> >> I'm not sure I understand the comment as it is empty already. >> >> --Sean >> >>> >>> Thanks >>> Max >>> >>> On 07/03/2012 01:34 AM, Sean Mullan wrote: >>>> Yep, looks good. >>>> >>>> On 07/02/2012 11:59 AM, Tom Hawtin wrote: >>>>> Looks good. >>>>> >>>>> Tom >>>>> >>>>> On 02/07/2012 16:54, Jason Uh wrote: >>>>>> Thanks for your comments. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please see updated webrev: >>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/7133344/webrev.01 >>>>>> >>>>>> Jason >>>>>> >>>>>> On 07/02/2012 08:45 AM, Tom Hawtin wrote: >>>>>>> On 02/07/2012 16:00, Jason Uh wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This change is documentation for allowing a user to specify an >>>>>>>> alternate >>>>>>>> java.security file. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/7133344/webrev.00/ >>>>>>>> CR: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7133344 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +# An alternate java.security properties file may be specified >>>>>>> +# from the command line via the system property >>>>>>> +# >>>>>>> +# java.security.properties=<URL> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think that should be: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +# -Djava.security.properties=<URL> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tom >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
