On 3/25/2013 6:59 AM, Simone Bordet wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Brad Wetmore
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Simone,
I haven't looked at the proposal yet, but just from a scheduling point of
view, unfortunately we're finishing up the implementation of the last of the
planned features for JDK 8, so getting this into 8 is likely not possible.
"Likely not possible" means "totally impossible" or "if you do this
and that, then it's possible" ? :)
I would never say "totally impossible," but closer to "totally
impossible" than "likely not possible."
Do you know the status of JEP 114 ? Will it be shipped in JDK 8 ?
That is still the expectation. We had to pull 114 temporarily because
of a conflict in two projects, and we'll be working on resolving the
merge when the engineer is back from vacation.
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8009925
We have an open bug for this (JDK-8007785) and it's on the radar for JDK 9.
Ok, if impossible I will eventually pop up again when JDK 8 is
released and JDK 9 work started.
Planning for JDK 9's features will start well before that. Some of the
dev work will already be underway by release.
Brad
Thanks !
--
Simone Bordet
http://bordet.blogspot.com
---
Finally, no matter how good the architecture and design are,
to deliver bug-free software with optimal performance and reliability,
the implementation technique must be flawless. Victoria Livschitz
