Sean wrote:
> That kind of seems like a javadoc bug to me. Shouldn't it add the
> @since tag as part of inheriting the javadoc?
On the chance that this is a real bug, I filed this yesterday:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029241
@throws/@since are both missing (others?), it seems more efficient from
a developer perspective to simply copy this info to the overridden
classes, instead of making the developer drill down to get the rest of
the information.
Tony wrote:
> Let me see if setting @since doesn't cause the inheritance of the
> other tag to stop. If it doesn't I'll fix it for 8.
I'm guessing that if you add anything, it's going to suppress the
inherited javadoc, so you'll have to wait for JDK-8029241 to be fixed.
But for the case of new stuff where you've provided new text, I feel it
should have an @since added.
And feel free to clean up the > 80 char lines! ;)
Brad
On 11/27/2013 12:46 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
On Nov 27, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Sean Mullan <sean.mul...@oracle.com> wrote:
On 11/26/2013 08:20 PM, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
Tony,
I note the @since's are missing for the new methods, both in the
generated output in the overridden methods (i.e. no javadoc), and the
methods in which you've changed the behavior (i.e. new javadoc).
I'm not sure what you can do about the previous behavior (cc'ing
Mike/Sowmya, maybe they know), but what about the new ones?
That kind of seems like a javadoc bug to me. Shouldn't it add the @since tag as
part of inheriting the javadoc?
Anyway, adding @since tags would be considered a docs only change, so Tony you
could still fix this for JDK 8 - can you file a bug?
Thanks,
Sean
My first thought was it would be a javadoc issue too.
Let me see if setting @since doesn't cause the inheritance of the other tag to
stop. If it doesn't I'll fix it for 8.
Tony
Brad
On 10/21/2013 2:48 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
On 10/18/2013 10:52 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
I've updated the webrev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8025763/webrev.01/
Update looks good.
--Sean
