On 11/12/2013 13:17, Artem Ananiev wrote:
Hi, Alan,
the changes look fine to me.
A short quick question: what is the reason to introduce a new
AWTPermissions class as a holder for various AWTPermission constants?
We can have the same fields directly in AWTPermission. The only
difference is that AWTPermission is in java.awt, while the new class
is in sun.awt, but such a change seem to require a CCC request anyway...
Thanks Artem. Adding them to AWTPermission would bring them into Java SE
/ public API and that doesn't seem to be worth it. The main thing is
that we move them out of sun.security.util.SecurityConstants so that we
can finally eliminate the execution-time dependency (what we have in the
jdk8 forest is okay for profiles but we need to do better with modules).
-Alan.
