Hi Raghu,
I'm not an official Reviewer, but I have some comments, mostly about
X509Test.java.
1. I'm not sure if this matters, but the formatting of your copyright
header is a little strange. The text appears to be correct, but the line
breaks occur at non-standard places. If you look at any other file, the
first couple lines would look like this:
/*
* Copyright (c) 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
Again, not sure how important this is, but it applies to every file in
the webrev. I'd suggest changing them.
2. checkMethod():
Doesn't appear to be used anywhere. Do you want to keep this? If you do,
could you add a comment to explain the parameters?
Also, in general for the rest of the methods, there are a lot of
parameters noted with the @param tag. If you want to leave those javadoc
style comments in, could you please describe the params?
3. equals() and assertByteArray() both seem to be "assertEquals()"-style
methods, but they are named a bit differently. could you make the naming
consistent? For example, maybe assertEquals / assertByteArrayEquals.
4. getElementesTest() should probably read getElementsTest(). You use
this method in IssuerAlternativeNameExtensionTest.java, by the way.
Otherwise, I think the tests look good to me, but again, I'm not a
Reviewer, so you still need an official review.
Thanks,
Jason
On 08/25/2014 03:59 AM, raghu k.nair wrote:
Hi Vincent / Jason,
Could you please help in reviewing the following test.
Thanks,
Raghu Nair
On 8/12/2014 10:28 AM, raghu k.nair wrote:
Hello,
Please review the tests for sun.security.x509 classes.
These cover tests for GeneralName, GeneralNames, GeneralSubtree,
GeneralSubtrees, IPAddressName and IssuerAlternativeNameExtension.
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rhalade/8049039/webrev.00/
Bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8049039
Thanks,
Raghu Nair
